PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COPP vs. URNJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

COPP vs. URNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) and Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

COPP vs. URNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
COPP
Sprott Copper Miners ETF
2.61%74.02%4.18%
URNJ
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
16.23%45.35%-22.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPP achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly lower than URNJ's 16.23% return.


COPP

1D
9.20%
1M
-18.73%
YTD
2.61%
6M
29.46%
1Y
86.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

URNJ

1D
9.99%
1M
-15.88%
YTD
16.23%
6M
7.68%
1Y
118.59%
3Y*
29.85%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


COPP vs. URNJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than URNJ's 0.80% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

COPP vs. URNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPP
COPP Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
COPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPP Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
COPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

URNJ
URNJ Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
URNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
URNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
URNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
URNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPP vs. URNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) and Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COPPURNJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.93

1.88

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.39

2.49

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.30

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

3.55

-0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.92

8.73

+2.19

COPP vs. URNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPP Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the URNJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPP and URNJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COPPURNJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

1.88

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.33

+0.55

Correlation

The correlation between COPP and URNJ is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

COPP vs. URNJ - Dividend Comparison

COPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than URNJ's 5.66% yield.


TTM202520242023
COPP
Sprott Copper Miners ETF
2.31%2.37%2.59%0.00%
URNJ
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
5.66%6.58%4.33%4.03%

Drawdowns

COPP vs. URNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPP drawdown since its inception was -44.37%, smaller than the maximum URNJ drawdown of -59.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPP and URNJ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


COPPURNJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.37%

-59.21%

+14.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.91%

-34.13%

+5.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.51%

-27.55%

+8.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.33%

-20.92%

+6.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.45%

13.87%

-6.42%

Volatility

COPP vs. URNJ - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) and Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ) have volatilities of 19.84% and 20.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


COPPURNJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.84%

20.63%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.18%

47.79%

-13.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.97%

63.33%

-18.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.03%

53.24%

-13.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.03%

53.24%

-13.21%