COPM.AS vs. R1GR.AS
COPM.AS (iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF) and R1GR.AS (iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COPM.AS is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global Copper Miners Index, while R1GR.AS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth UCITS 30/18 Capped index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, COPM.AS returned 110.00% vs 26.08% for R1GR.AS. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COPM.AS charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for R1GR.AS.
Performance
COPM.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COPM.AS achieves a 27.79% return, which is significantly higher than R1GR.AS's 6.63% return.
COPM.AS
- 1D
- -2.44%
- 1M
- 16.46%
- YTD
- 27.79%
- 6M
- 38.45%
- 1Y
- 110.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
R1GR.AS
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 6.06%
- YTD
- 6.63%
- 6M
- 6.84%
- 1Y
- 26.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COPM.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
COPM.AS iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF | 27.79% | 82.17% | 0.45% | -4.72% |
R1GR.AS iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF | 6.63% | 17.57% | 35.07% | 6.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between COPM.AS and R1GR.AS is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2023 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COPM.AS vs. R1GR.AS — Risk / Return Rank
COPM.AS
R1GR.AS
COPM.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF (COPM.AS) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (R1GR.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COPM.AS | R1GR.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.29 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.32 | 1.64 | +2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.56 | 5.35 | +10.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COPM.AS | R1GR.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.91 | 1.68 | +1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 1.33 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
COPM.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPM.AS drawdown since its inception was -37.12%, which is greater than R1GR.AS's maximum drawdown of -23.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPM.AS and R1GR.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPM.AS | R1GR.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.12% | -23.09% | -14.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.05% | -15.71% | -9.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | -1.36% | -1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.55% | -3.34% | -8.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.98% | 4.84% | +2.14% |
Volatility
COPM.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF (COPM.AS) has a higher volatility of 14.68% compared to iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (R1GR.AS) at 4.25%. This indicates that COPM.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than R1GR.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COPM.AS | R1GR.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.68% | 4.25% | +10.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.95% | 11.33% | +20.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.22% | 15.41% | +21.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.34% | 18.92% | +15.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.34% | 18.92% | +15.42% |
COPM.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPM.AS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than R1GR.AS's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
COPM.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Dividend Comparison
Neither COPM.AS nor R1GR.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
COPM.AS and R1GR.AS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, R1GR.AS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
R1GR.AS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for COPM.AS.
COPM.AS is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while R1GR.AS is Large Cap Growth Equities. COPM.AS tracks STOXX Global Copper Miners Index, while R1GR.AS tracks Russell 1000 Growth UCITS 30/18 Capped index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for COPM.AS and 0.18% for R1GR.AS.
Find the right allocation for COPM.AS and R1GR.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer