PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COPJ vs. GDXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COPJ vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPJ achieves a 15.22% return, which is significantly higher than GDXJ's -2.55% return.


COPJ

1D
-4.49%
1M
13.66%
YTD
15.22%
6M
30.03%
1Y
123.62%
3Y*
45.39%
5Y*
10Y*

GDXJ

1D
-4.40%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
-2.55%
6M
6.26%
1Y
65.12%
3Y*
46.12%
5Y*
17.46%
10Y*
13.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COPJ vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
15.22%140.63%11.07%-5.30%
GDXJ
VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF
-2.55%172.28%15.67%-1.27%

Correlation

The correlation between COPJ and GDXJ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023

0.60

The correlation between COPJ and GDXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

COPJ vs. GDXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
COPJ
GDXJ

Basic Materials

100.0%
100.0%

Technology

3.6%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

COPJ
100.0%
GDXJ
100.0%

Technology

COPJ
3.6%
GDXJ

-

Communication Services

COPJ

-

GDXJ

-

Consumer Cyclical

COPJ

-

GDXJ

-

Consumer Defensive

COPJ

-

GDXJ

-

Energy

COPJ

-

GDXJ

-

Financial Services

COPJ

-

GDXJ

-

Healthcare

COPJ

-

GDXJ

-

Industrials

COPJ

-

GDXJ

-

Real Estate

COPJ

-

GDXJ

-

Utilities

COPJ

-

GDXJ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COPJ vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPJ
COPJ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
COPJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
COPJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPJ Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXJ
GDXJ Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GDXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPJ vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COPJGDXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.24

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

1.99

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.26

4.95

+6.31

COPJ vs. GDXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is higher than the GDXJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPJ and GDXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COPJGDXJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95

1.32

+1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.06

+1.04

Drawdowns

COPJ vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPJ drawdown since its inception was -32.28%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPJ and GDXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COPJGDXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.28%

-88.66%

+56.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.28%

-32.92%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.28%

-32.92%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.93%

-29.01%

+17.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.86%

-60.50%

+48.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.02%

13.19%

-2.17%

Volatility

COPJ vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) is 15.44%, while VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 16.66%. This indicates that COPJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COPJGDXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.44%

16.66%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.19%

41.34%

-6.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.16%

49.79%

-7.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.78%

41.10%

-6.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.78%

44.06%

-9.28%

COPJ vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPJ has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXJ's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

COPJ vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison

COPJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.04%, more than GDXJ's 2.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
10.04%11.57%11.64%2.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GDXJ
VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF
2.39%2.33%2.61%0.72%0.51%1.78%1.58%0.39%0.45%0.03%4.78%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


COPJ and GDXJ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXJ has higher volatility (16.66%) compared to COPJ (15.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COPJ dropped -32.28% vs GDXJ's -88.66%.

On 3-year performance, GDXJ leads with 46.12% vs 45.39% for COPJ. On fees, GDXJ is cheaper at 0.54% per year. On volatility, COPJ has been the lower-risk option at 15.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GDXJ has performed better with a 46.12% return vs 45.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDXJ is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for COPJ.

COPJ has the higher dividend yield at 10.04%, compared with 2.39% for GDXJ.

COPJ is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while GDXJ is Materials. COPJ tracks Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index, while GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for COPJ and 0.54% for GDXJ.

COPJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COPJ and GDXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer