COPG.L vs. QYLP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (COPG.L) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP (QYLP.L).
COPG.L and QYLP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COPG.L is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. It was launched on Nov 22, 2021. QYLP.L is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Nov 22, 2022. Both COPG.L and QYLP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
COPG.L vs. QYLP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
COPG.L vs. QYLP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPG.L Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc | 9.97% | 82.05% | 3.66% | 3.03% | 4.90% |
QYLP.L Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP | -0.49% | -4.48% | 21.40% | 14.93% | -2.55% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COPG.L achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly higher than QYLP.L's -0.49% return.
COPG.L
- 1D
- 6.05%
- 1M
- -14.87%
- YTD
- 9.97%
- 6M
- 35.56%
- 1Y
- 99.44%
- 3Y*
- 26.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLP.L
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 6.36%
- 1Y
- 5.94%
- 3Y*
- 6.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COPG.L vs. QYLP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPG.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLP.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
COPG.L vs. QYLP.L — Risk / Return Rank
COPG.L
QYLP.L
COPG.L vs. QYLP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (COPG.L) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP (QYLP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COPG.L | QYLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.63 | 0.44 | +2.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.99 | 0.70 | +2.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.11 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 1.12 | +2.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.49 | 3.30 | +12.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COPG.L | QYLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 0.44 | +2.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.64 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between COPG.L and QYLP.L is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
COPG.L vs. QYLP.L - Dividend Comparison
COPG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QYLP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.98%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
COPG.L Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLP.L Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP | 7.98% | 8.93% | 8.31% | 9.56% |
Drawdowns
COPG.L vs. QYLP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPG.L drawdown since its inception was -38.84%, which is greater than QYLP.L's maximum drawdown of -22.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPG.L and QYLP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPG.L | QYLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.84% | -22.40% | -16.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.29% | -9.45% | -16.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.93% | -9.34% | -7.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.03% | -5.57% | -8.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.57% | 1.76% | +4.81% |
Volatility
COPG.L vs. QYLP.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (COPG.L) has a higher volatility of 16.02% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP (QYLP.L) at 3.32%. This indicates that COPG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| COPG.L | QYLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.02% | 3.32% | +12.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.87% | 7.09% | +23.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.62% | 13.42% | +24.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.37% | 12.42% | +20.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.37% | 12.42% | +20.95% |