PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QYLP.L vs. JEQP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QYLP.L vs. JEQP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP (QYLP.L) and JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP (JEQP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QYLP.L vs. JEQP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Different Trading Currencies

QYLP.L is traded in GBP, while JEQP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JEQP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QYLP.L achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly higher than JEQP.L's -1.18% return.


QYLP.L

1D
1.07%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
-0.49%
6M
6.36%
1Y
5.94%
3Y*
6.39%
5Y*
10Y*

JEQP.L

1D
2.06%
1M
-1.52%
YTD
-1.18%
6M
4.16%
1Y
17.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QYLP.L vs. JEQP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QYLP.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than JEQP.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QYLP.L vs. JEQP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLP.L
QYLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
QYLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

JEQP.L
JEQP.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
JEQP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEQP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEQP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
JEQP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEQP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QYLP.L vs. JEQP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP (QYLP.L) and JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP (JEQP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QYLP.LJEQP.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.44

1.14

-0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.70

1.63

-0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.23

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

2.94

-1.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.30

10.32

-7.02

QYLP.L vs. JEQP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QYLP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the JEQP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QYLP.L and JEQP.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QYLP.LJEQP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

1.14

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.47

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between QYLP.L and JEQP.L is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QYLP.L vs. JEQP.L - Dividend Comparison

QYLP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.98%, less than JEQP.L's 11.04% yield.


Drawdowns

QYLP.L vs. JEQP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLP.L drawdown since its inception was -22.40%, roughly equal to the maximum JEQP.L drawdown of -21.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLP.L and JEQP.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QYLP.LJEQP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.40%

-21.99%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.45%

-9.99%

+0.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.34%

-2.83%

-6.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.57%

-5.46%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

1.67%

+0.09%

Volatility

QYLP.L vs. JEQP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP (QYLP.L) is 3.32%, while JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP (JEQP.L) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that QYLP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEQP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QYLP.LJEQP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

4.50%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.09%

9.77%

-2.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.42%

15.37%

-1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.42%

15.68%

-3.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.42%

15.68%

-3.26%