PortfoliosLab logo
QYLP.L vs. QYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QYLP.L and QYLD is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

QYLP.L vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP (QYLP.L) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QYLP.L:

0.02

QYLD:

0.34

Sortino Ratio

QYLP.L:

0.18

QYLD:

0.56

Omega Ratio

QYLP.L:

1.03

QYLD:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

QYLP.L:

0.04

QYLD:

0.30

Martin Ratio

QYLP.L:

0.10

QYLD:

1.01

Ulcer Index

QYLP.L:

8.39%

QYLD:

5.60%

Daily Std Dev

QYLP.L:

16.34%

QYLD:

19.16%

Max Drawdown

QYLP.L:

-21.91%

QYLD:

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

QYLP.L:

-19.20%

QYLD:

-9.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QYLP.L achieves a -15.13% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's -5.59% return.


QYLP.L

YTD

-15.13%

1M

-1.37%

6M

-10.58%

1Y

0.33%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QYLD

YTD

-5.59%

1M

1.45%

6M

-3.85%

1Y

6.38%

3Y*

9.43%

5Y*

7.91%

10Y*

7.67%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QYLP.L vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QYLP.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QYLP.L vs. QYLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLP.L
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QYLP.L is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QYLP.L is 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QYLP.L is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QYLP.L is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QYLP.L is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QYLP.L is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QYLD is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QYLP.L vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP (QYLP.L) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current QYLP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QYLP.L and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

QYLP.L vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

QYLP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.52%, less than QYLD's 13.78% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QYLP.L
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP
9.52%8.31%9.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
13.78%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%10.74%

Drawdowns

QYLP.L vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLP.L drawdown since its inception was -21.91%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLP.L and QYLD.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

QYLP.L vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP (QYLP.L) has a higher volatility of 3.11% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.90%. This indicates that QYLP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...