COPG.L vs. BKCG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (COPG.L) and Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BKCG.L).
COPG.L and BKCG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COPG.L is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. It was launched on Nov 22, 2021. BKCG.L is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Jan 21, 2022. Both COPG.L and BKCG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
COPG.L vs. BKCG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
COPG.L vs. BKCG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPG.L Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc | 9.97% | 82.05% | 3.66% | 3.03% | 9.26% |
BKCG.L Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | -11.48% | 23.16% | 6.98% | 308.24% | -77.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COPG.L achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly higher than BKCG.L's -11.48% return.
COPG.L
- 1D
- 6.05%
- 1M
- -14.87%
- YTD
- 9.97%
- 6M
- 35.56%
- 1Y
- 99.44%
- 3Y*
- 26.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKCG.L
- 1D
- 5.48%
- 1M
- -11.21%
- YTD
- -11.48%
- 6M
- -32.71%
- 1Y
- 75.78%
- 3Y*
- 41.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COPG.L vs. BKCG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPG.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BKCG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
COPG.L vs. BKCG.L — Risk / Return Rank
COPG.L
BKCG.L
COPG.L vs. BKCG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (COPG.L) and Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BKCG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COPG.L | BKCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.63 | 1.11 | +1.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.99 | 1.69 | +1.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.20 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 1.23 | +2.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.49 | 2.50 | +12.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COPG.L | BKCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 1.11 | +1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.02 | +0.67 |
Correlation
The correlation between COPG.L and BKCG.L is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
COPG.L vs. BKCG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither COPG.L nor BKCG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
COPG.L vs. BKCG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPG.L drawdown since its inception was -38.84%, smaller than the maximum BKCG.L drawdown of -82.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPG.L and BKCG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPG.L | BKCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.84% | -82.56% | +43.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.29% | -54.08% | +27.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.93% | -51.56% | +34.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.03% | -43.79% | +29.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.57% | 26.52% | -19.95% |
Volatility
COPG.L vs. BKCG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (COPG.L) is 16.02%, while Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BKCG.L) has a volatility of 17.35%. This indicates that COPG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKCG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| COPG.L | BKCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.02% | 17.35% | -1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.87% | 53.14% | -22.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.62% | 68.07% | -30.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.37% | 74.88% | -41.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.37% | 74.88% | -41.51% |