COPG.L vs. DRVG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (COPG.L) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L).
COPG.L and DRVG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COPG.L is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. It was launched on Nov 22, 2021. DRVG.L is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Nov 16, 2021. Both COPG.L and DRVG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
COPG.L vs. DRVG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
COPG.L vs. DRVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPG.L Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc | 3.70% | 82.05% | 3.66% | 3.03% | 14.35% | -1.92% |
DRVG.L Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 1.88% | 20.43% | -4.12% | 19.60% | -26.53% | -1.56% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COPG.L achieves a 3.70% return, which is significantly higher than DRVG.L's 1.88% return.
COPG.L
- 1D
- 2.20%
- 1M
- -21.65%
- YTD
- 3.70%
- 6M
- 29.50%
- 1Y
- 90.62%
- 3Y*
- 24.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRVG.L
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- 1.88%
- 6M
- 8.69%
- 1Y
- 40.97%
- 3Y*
- 6.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COPG.L vs. DRVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPG.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DRVG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
COPG.L vs. DRVG.L — Risk / Return Rank
COPG.L
DRVG.L
COPG.L vs. DRVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (COPG.L) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COPG.L | DRVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.42 | 1.58 | +0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.80 | 2.17 | +0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.29 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 2.66 | +0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.86 | 8.92 | +3.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COPG.L | DRVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 1.58 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | -0.01 | +0.65 |
Correlation
The correlation between COPG.L and DRVG.L is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
COPG.L vs. DRVG.L - Dividend Comparison
COPG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPG.L Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DRVG.L Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 0.60% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Drawdowns
COPG.L vs. DRVG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPG.L drawdown since its inception was -38.84%, roughly equal to the maximum DRVG.L drawdown of -40.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPG.L and DRVG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPG.L | DRVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.84% | -40.24% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.29% | -15.08% | -11.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.67% | -9.29% | -12.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.03% | -18.41% | +4.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.85% | 4.35% | +2.50% |
Volatility
COPG.L vs. DRVG.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (COPG.L) has a higher volatility of 15.35% compared to Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L) at 7.24%. This indicates that COPG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| COPG.L | DRVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.35% | 7.24% | +8.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.35% | 15.87% | +14.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.38% | 25.94% | +11.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.26% | 24.83% | +8.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.26% | 24.83% | +8.43% |