COPA vs. GSIB

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

COPA (Themes Copper Miners ETF) and GSIB (Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COPA is a Copper fund tracking the BITA Global Copper Mining Select Index, while GSIB is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Themes. COPA is passively managed, while GSIB is actively managed. Over the past year, COPA returned 85.34% vs 49.59% for GSIB. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

COPA vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Copper Miners ETF (COPA) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPA achieves a 11.80% return, which is significantly lower than GSIB's 23.08% return.

COPA

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 0.04%
• 6M: -1.55%
• YTD: 11.80%
• 1Y: 85.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 43.28%

GSIB

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 6.91%
• 6M: 16.90%
• YTD: 23.08%
• 1Y: 49.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 45.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
COPA Themes Copper Miners ETF	$160.04K	$142.88K	$165.97K
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	$1.86M	$1.42M	$773.56K

COPA vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
COPA Themes Copper Miners ETF	11.80%	100.86%	-13.18%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	23.08%	61.67%	8.85%

Correlation

The correlation between COPA and GSIB is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024	0.54

The correlation between COPA and GSIB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

COPA vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

COPA

COPA Risk / Return Rank: 72
COPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
COPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
COPA Omega Ratio Rank: 67
COPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
COPA Martin Ratio Rank: 66

GSIB

GSIB Risk / Return Rank: 91
GSIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
GSIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
GSIB Omega Ratio Rank: 92
GSIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
GSIB Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

COPA vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Copper Miners ETF (COPA) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COPA	GSIB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	2.80	-0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	3.86	-1.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.46	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	3.58	-0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.61	12.59	-3.98

COPA vs. GSIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPA Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the GSIB Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPA and GSIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COPA vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPA drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPA and GSIB.

Drawdown Indicators

	COPA	GSIB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.72%	-17.71%	-17.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.05%	-13.90%	-14.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.45%	0.00%	-13.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.87%	-1.99%	-7.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.94%	3.95%	+5.99%

Volatility

COPA vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison

Themes Copper Miners ETF (COPA) has a higher volatility of 13.64% compared to Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) at 5.73%. This indicates that COPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COPA	GSIB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.64%	5.73%	+7.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.80%	14.90%	+20.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.18%	17.83%	+25.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.53%	18.45%	+21.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.53%	18.45%	+21.08%

COPA vs. GSIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both COPA and GSIB have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

COPA vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison

COPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than GSIB's 1.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
COPA Themes Copper Miners ETF	3.81%	4.26%	1.33%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	1.55%	1.91%	1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COPA and GSIB in my portfolio?

COPA and GSIB have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COPA or GSIB?

COPA has higher volatility (13.64%) compared to GSIB (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COPA dropped -34.72% vs GSIB's -17.71%.

Which ETF is better, COPA or GSIB?

On 1-year performance, COPA leads with 85.34% vs 49.59% for GSIB. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, GSIB has been the lower-risk option at 5.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, COPA or GSIB?

Over the 1-year period, COPA has performed better with a 85.34% return vs 49.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, COPA or GSIB?

COPA and GSIB have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COPA or GSIB?

COPA has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 1.55% for GSIB.

What is the main difference between COPA and GSIB?

COPA is categorized as Copper, while GSIB is Financials Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.