PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CONY vs. XRMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CONY vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CONY vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CONY
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
-21.78%-26.34%23.62%81.04%
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
-2.52%4.60%15.18%-0.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CONY achieves a -21.78% return, which is significantly lower than XRMI's -2.52% return.


CONY

1D
7.47%
1M
0.40%
YTD
-21.78%
6M
-45.25%
1Y
-20.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XRMI

1D
0.81%
1M
-4.04%
YTD
-2.52%
6M
1.58%
1Y
3.59%
3Y*
6.04%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CONY vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CONY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CONY vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CONY
CONY Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
CONY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CONY Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CONY Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
CONY Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
CONY Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

XRMI
XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CONY vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CONYXRMIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.34

0.52

-0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.13

0.76

-0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.11

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

0.79

-1.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.68

2.73

-3.41

CONY vs. XRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CONY Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the XRMI Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CONY and XRMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CONYXRMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.34

0.52

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.24

-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between CONY and XRMI is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CONY vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison

CONY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 211.70%, more than XRMI's 12.83% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
CONY
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
211.70%192.07%155.66%16.43%0.00%0.00%
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.83%12.35%11.86%12.62%12.84%2.93%

Drawdowns

CONY vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CONY drawdown since its inception was -63.57%, which is greater than XRMI's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONY and XRMI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CONYXRMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.57%

-15.31%

-48.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.39%

-5.02%

-58.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.69%

-4.25%

-51.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.17%

-6.10%

-14.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.90%

1.45%

+29.45%

Volatility

CONY vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) has a higher volatility of 19.73% compared to Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) at 2.62%. This indicates that CONY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CONYXRMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.73%

2.62%

+17.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.88%

4.50%

+40.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.46%

6.88%

+52.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.54%

6.99%

+53.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.54%

6.99%

+53.55%