CONY vs. RBIL

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CONY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. CONY is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, CONY returned -44.97% vs 3.81% for RBIL. Their -0.08 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CONY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

CONY vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CONY achieves a -28.89% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.61% return.

CONY

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -6.43%
• 6M: -6.04%
• YTD: -28.89%
• 1Y: -44.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.53%

RBIL

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.18%
• 6M: 2.25%
• YTD: 2.61%
• 1Y: 3.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	$6.79M	$6.36M	$9.84M
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	$1.19M	$1.87M	$2.26M

CONY vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	-28.89%	-20.27%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.61%	2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between CONY and RBIL is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025	-0.08

Return for Risk

CONY vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CONY

CONY Risk / Return Rank: 3
CONY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CONY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CONY Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CONY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CONY Martin Ratio Rank: 3

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CONY vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CONY	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.79	3.98	-4.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.07	6.13	-7.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	2.00	-1.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	6.80	-7.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.15	27.52	-28.67

CONY vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CONY Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 3.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CONY and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CONY vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CONY drawdown since its inception was -63.57%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONY and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CONY	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.57%	-0.56%	-63.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.52%	-0.56%	-58.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.72%	-0.22%	-59.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.27%	-0.08%	-24.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.17%	0.14%	+39.03%

Volatility

CONY vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) has a higher volatility of 16.81% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.28%. This indicates that CONY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CONY	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.81%	0.28%	+16.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.75%	0.89%	+45.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.39%	0.96%	+56.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.81%	1.06%	+58.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.81%	1.06%	+58.75%

CONY vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CONY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

CONY vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

CONY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 165.10%, more than RBIL's 4.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	165.10%	192.07%	155.66%	16.43%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.16%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CONY and RBIL in my portfolio?

CONY and RBIL have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CONY or RBIL?

CONY has higher volatility (16.81%) compared to RBIL (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONY dropped -63.57% vs RBIL's -0.56%.

Which ETF is better, CONY or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, RBIL leads with 3.81% vs -44.97% for CONY. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CONY or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, RBIL has performed better with a 3.81% return vs -44.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CONY or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CONY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CONY or RBIL?

CONY has the higher dividend yield at 165.10%, compared with 4.16% for RBIL.

What is the main difference between CONY and RBIL?

CONY is categorized as Derivative Income, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CONY and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.98 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.