CONWX vs. ZTR
CONWX (Concorde Wealth Management Fund) and ZTR (Virtus Total Return Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, CONWX returned 8.13%/yr vs 6.50%/yr for ZTR. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CONWX charges 1.41%/yr vs 3.77%/yr for ZTR.
Performance
CONWX vs. ZTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CONWX achieves a 7.66% return, which is significantly lower than ZTR's 14.03% return. Over the past 10 years, CONWX has outperformed ZTR with an annualized return of 8.13%, while ZTR has yielded a comparatively lower 6.50% annualized return.
CONWX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 7.66%
- 1Y
- 16.33%
- 3Y*
- 11.21%
- 5Y*
- 6.58%
- 10Y*
- 8.13%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.52%
ZTR
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 9.82%
- YTD
- 14.03%
- 1Y
- 21.28%
- 3Y*
- 14.51%
- 5Y*
- 4.90%
- 10Y*
- 6.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $894.66K | $1.50M | $1.08M |
CONWX vs. ZTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CONWX Concorde Wealth Management Fund | 7.66% | 11.95% | 13.58% | 0.20% | -2.51% | 19.73% | 8.76% | 16.84% | -1.95% | 7.17% |
ZTR Virtus Total Return Fund | 14.03% | 18.63% | 18.31% | -3.21% | -21.32% | 20.57% | -11.78% | 44.65% | -24.86% | 29.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between CONWX and ZTR is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CONWX vs. ZTR — Risk / Return Rank
CONWX
ZTR
CONWX vs. ZTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX) and Virtus Total Return Fund (ZTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CONWX | ZTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.31 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 2.91 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.32 | 7.67 | +0.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CONWX vs. ZTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CONWX drawdown since its inception was -26.09%, smaller than the maximum ZTR drawdown of -57.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONWX and ZTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CONWX | ZTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.09% | -57.25% | +31.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.44% | -7.07% | +2.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.86% | -23.06% | +13.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.49% | -42.64% | +30.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.09% | -57.25% | +31.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.50% | -0.58% | -1.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.79% | -9.32% | +6.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 2.68% | -0.85% |
Volatility
CONWX vs. ZTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX) is 1.88%, while Virtus Total Return Fund (ZTR) has a volatility of 2.68%. This indicates that CONWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CONWX | ZTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.88% | 2.68% | -0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.07% | 9.10% | -4.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.07% | 11.42% | -4.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.15% | 16.70% | -6.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.99% | 21.60% | -10.61% |
CONWX vs. ZTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CONWX has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is lower than ZTR's 3.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
CONWX vs. ZTR - Dividend Comparison
CONWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, less than ZTR's 8.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CONWX Concorde Wealth Management Fund | 3.43% | 3.69% | 10.55% | 2.16% | 7.85% | 3.63% | 3.86% | 2.16% | 5.09% | 2.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZTR Virtus Total Return Fund | 8.96% | 9.52% | 10.24% | 15.25% | 15.88% | 10.96% | 13.72% | 11.89% | 15.18% | 13.85% | 10.58% | 9.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CONWX and ZTR have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZTR has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to CONWX (1.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONWX dropped -26.09% vs ZTR's -57.25%.
CONWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CONWX and ZTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer