CONWX vs. FKINX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CONWX (Concorde Wealth Management Fund) and FKINX (Franklin Income Fund Class A1) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, CONWX returned 8.21%/yr vs 7.48%/yr for FKINX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CONWX charges 1.41%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for FKINX.

Performance

CONWX vs. FKINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX) and Franklin Income Fund Class A1 (FKINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CONWX achieves a 6.98% return, which is significantly higher than FKINX's 5.16% return. Over the past 10 years, CONWX has outperformed FKINX with an annualized return of 8.21%, while FKINX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.

CONWX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -0.77%
• YTD: 6.98%
• 6M: 6.89%
• 1Y: 16.04%
• 3Y*: 12.21%
• 5Y*: 6.49%
• 10Y*: 8.21%

FKINX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.84%
• YTD: 5.16%
• 6M: 5.58%
• 1Y: 14.78%
• 3Y*: 10.29%
• 5Y*: 6.33%
• 10Y*: 7.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CONWX vs. FKINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CONWX Concorde Wealth Management Fund	6.98%	11.95%	13.58%	0.20%	-2.51%	19.73%	8.76%	16.84%	-1.95%	7.17%
FKINX Franklin Income Fund Class A1	5.16%	12.24%	7.12%	8.65%	-5.29%	17.21%	3.57%	15.75%	-5.54%	8.43%

Correlation

The correlation between CONWX and FKINX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2016	0.71

The correlation between CONWX and FKINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CONWX vs. FKINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CONWX

CONWX Risk / Return Rank: 71
CONWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
CONWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
CONWX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
CONWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CONWX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

FKINX

FKINX Risk / Return Rank: 87
FKINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FKINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FKINX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FKINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FKINX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CONWX vs. FKINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX) and Franklin Income Fund Class A1 (FKINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CONWX	FKINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	2.75	-0.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	4.10	-0.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.59	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.50	4.33	+0.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.12	17.60	-4.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CONWX vs. FKINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CONWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the FKINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CONWX and FKINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CONWX	FKINX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.38	2.75	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.80	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74	0.81	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	0.91	-0.14

Drawdowns

CONWX vs. FKINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CONWX drawdown since its inception was -26.09%, smaller than the maximum FKINX drawdown of -43.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONWX and FKINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CONWX	FKINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.09%	-43.18%	+17.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.68%	-3.43%	-0.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.86%	-7.42%	-2.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.49%	-13.20%	+0.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.09%	-23.91%	-2.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.11%	0.00%	-3.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.78%	-3.71%	+0.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.26%	0.84%	+0.42%

Volatility

CONWX vs. FKINX - Volatility Comparison

Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to Franklin Income Fund Class A1 (FKINX) at 1.20%. This indicates that CONWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FKINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CONWX	FKINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.42%	1.20%	+0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.13%	3.81%	+1.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.96%	5.40%	+1.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.19%	7.90%	+2.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.10%	9.27%	+1.83%

CONWX vs. FKINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CONWX has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is higher than FKINX's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

CONWX vs. FKINX - Dividend Comparison

CONWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, less than FKINX's 5.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CONWX Concorde Wealth Management Fund	3.45%	3.69%	10.55%	2.16%	7.85%	3.63%	3.86%	2.16%	5.09%	2.48%	0.00%	0.00%
FKINX Franklin Income Fund Class A1	5.52%	5.58%	5.59%	5.52%	5.22%	6.52%	5.22%	5.11%	5.34%	5.04%	5.19%	5.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CONWX and FKINX in my portfolio?

CONWX and FKINX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CONWX or FKINX?

CONWX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to FKINX (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONWX dropped -26.09% vs FKINX's -43.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FKINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.