CONL vs. VRT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CONL (GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, CONL returned -11.06%/yr vs 156.88%/yr for VRT. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CONL vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CONL achieves a -56.79% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 106.51% return.

CONL

• 1D: -9.57%
• 1M: -21.27%
• YTD: -56.79%
• 6M: -68.91%
• 1Y: -74.16%
• 3Y*: -11.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VRT

• 1D: 3.43%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 106.51%
• 6M: 84.94%
• 1Y: 206.60%
• 3Y*: 156.88%
• 5Y*: 67.94%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CONL vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	-56.79%	-58.49%	4.23%	641.63%	-78.28%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	106.51%	42.80%	136.82%	251.81%	12.42%

Correlation

The correlation between CONL and VRT is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2022	0.42

The correlation between CONL and VRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CONL vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CONL

CONL Risk / Return Rank: 4
CONL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CONL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
CONL Omega Ratio Rank: 5
CONL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CONL Martin Ratio Rank: 3

VRT

VRT Risk / Return Rank: 95
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 92
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CONL vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CONL	VRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.54	3.62	-4.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.43	3.86	-4.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.48	-0.53
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.81	8.49	-9.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.13	24.38	-25.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CONL vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CONL Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CONL and VRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CONL	VRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.54	3.62	-4.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.18	1.05	-1.23

Drawdowns

CONL vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CONL drawdown since its inception was -93.95%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONL and VRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CONL	VRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.95%	-71.24%	-22.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-92.02%	-24.78%	-67.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-93.95%	-61.28%	-32.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-71.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-92.57%	-11.09%	-81.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.91%	-16.22%	-39.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	65.48%	8.63%	+56.85%

Volatility

CONL vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) has a higher volatility of 38.63% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 16.91%. This indicates that CONL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CONL	VRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	38.63%	16.91%	+21.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	100.69%	44.81%	+55.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	138.87%	57.50%	+81.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	149.87%	61.71%	+88.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	149.87%	54.59%	+95.28%

Dividends

CONL vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

CONL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	0.06%	0.11%	0.10%	0.05%	0.07%	0.04%	0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CONL and VRT in my portfolio?

CONL and VRT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CONL or VRT?

CONL has higher volatility (38.63%) compared to VRT (16.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONL dropped -93.95% vs VRT's -71.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.