CONL vs. VRT
CONL (GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, CONL returned -14.86%/yr vs 138.19%/yr for VRT. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CONL vs. VRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CONL achieves a -65.46% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 96.57% return.
CONL
- 1D
- -7.83%
- 1M
- -30.11%
- YTD
- -65.46%
- 6M
- -70.11%
- 1Y
- -86.06%
- 3Y*
- -14.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VRT
- 1D
- -11.07%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 96.57%
- 6M
- 91.55%
- 1Y
- 173.44%
- 3Y*
- 138.19%
- 5Y*
- 63.70%
- 10Y*
- —
CONL vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF | -65.46% | -58.49% | 4.23% | 641.63% | -80.40% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 96.57% | 42.80% | 136.82% | 251.81% | 5.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between CONL and VRT is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CONL vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank
CONL
VRT
CONL vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CONL | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.42 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 6.89 | -7.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 18.18 | -19.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CONL vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CONL drawdown since its inception was -94.36%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONL and VRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CONL | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.36% | -71.24% | -23.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -92.57% | -25.32% | -67.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.36% | -61.28% | -33.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -71.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.06% | -15.37% | -78.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.45% | -16.22% | -40.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 68.94% | 9.58% | +59.36% |
Volatility
CONL vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) has a higher volatility of 36.69% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 20.96%. This indicates that CONL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CONL | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 36.69% | 20.96% | +15.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 102.83% | 46.74% | +56.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 135.85% | 60.09% | +75.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 149.59% | 62.33% | +87.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 149.59% | 54.83% | +94.76% |
Dividends
CONL vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison
CONL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.07% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CONL and VRT have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CONL has higher volatility (36.69%) compared to VRT (20.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONL dropped -94.36% vs VRT's -71.24%.
VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CONL and VRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer