CONI vs. METD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CONI (GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF) and METD (Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CONI returned 3.74% vs 24.41% for METD. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CONI charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for METD.

Performance

CONI vs. METD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF (CONI) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CONI achieves a -20.46% return, which is significantly lower than METD's 10.02% return.

CONI

• 1D: 20.89%
• 1M: 13.11%
• 6M: -35.87%
• YTD: -20.46%
• 1Y: 3.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -69.09%

METD

• 1D: -3.30%
• 1M: 3.04%
• 6M: 20.93%
• YTD: 10.02%
• 1Y: 24.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -11.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CONI GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF	$8.69M	$7.39M	$8.65M
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	$10.85M	$12.45M	$7.88M

CONI vs. METD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CONI GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF	-20.46%	-70.84%	-53.81%
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	10.02%	-17.33%	-12.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CONI and METD is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024	0.33

Return for Risk

CONI vs. METD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CONI

CONI Risk / Return Rank: 25
CONI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
CONI Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
CONI Omega Ratio Rank: 36
CONI Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
CONI Martin Ratio Rank: 17

METD

METD Risk / Return Rank: 32
METD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
METD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
METD Omega Ratio Rank: 35
METD Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
METD Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CONI vs. METD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF (CONI) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CONI	METD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.27	0.74	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	1.24	+0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.17	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.50	1.09	-0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.84	2.50	-1.66

CONI vs. METD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CONI Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the METD Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CONI and METD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CONI vs. METD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CONI drawdown since its inception was -94.53%, which is greater than METD's maximum drawdown of -46.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONI and METD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CONI	METD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.53%	-46.03%	-48.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-75.12%	-26.03%	-49.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-90.25%	-29.29%	-60.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-74.60%	-28.87%	-45.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	45.08%	11.39%	+33.69%

Volatility

CONI vs. METD - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF (CONI) has a higher volatility of 40.36% compared to Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) at 15.23%. This indicates that CONI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than METD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CONI	METD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	40.36%	15.23%	+25.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	116.67%	30.46%	+86.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	139.37%	40.18%	+99.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	128.42%	37.75%	+90.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	128.42%	37.75%	+90.67%

CONI vs. METD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CONI has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than METD's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

CONI vs. METD - Dividend Comparison

CONI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than METD's 2.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CONI GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF	1.10%	0.87%	1.39%
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	2.51%	3.35%	2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CONI and METD in my portfolio?

CONI and METD have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CONI or METD?

CONI has higher volatility (40.36%) compared to METD (15.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONI dropped -94.53% vs METD's -46.03%.

Which ETF is better, CONI or METD?

On 1-year performance, METD leads with 24.41% vs 3.74% for CONI. On fees, METD is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, METD has been the lower-risk option at 15.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CONI or METD?

Over the 1-year period, METD has performed better with a 24.41% return vs 3.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CONI or METD?

METD is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for CONI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CONI or METD?

METD has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 1.10% for CONI.

What is the main difference between CONI and METD?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for CONI and 1.00% for METD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

METD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.