CONI vs. EMTY

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CONI (GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF) and EMTY (ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. CONI is actively managed, while EMTY is passively managed. Over the past year, CONI returned -58.67% vs 1.60% for EMTY. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CONI charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for EMTY.

Performance

CONI vs. EMTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF (CONI) and ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CONI achieves a -26.91% return, which is significantly lower than EMTY's 1.09% return.

CONI

• 1D: 9.21%
• 1M: 6.88%
• YTD: -26.91%
• 6M: -5.33%
• 1Y: -58.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMTY

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 1.81%
• YTD: 1.09%
• 6M: 3.80%
• 1Y: 1.60%
• 3Y*: -4.69%
• 5Y*: -2.87%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CONI vs. EMTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CONI GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF	-26.91%	-70.84%	-53.66%
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF	1.09%	-1.76%	-6.12%

Correlation

The correlation between CONI and EMTY is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024	0.33

Return for Risk

CONI vs. EMTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CONI

CONI Risk / Return Rank: 6
CONI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CONI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
CONI Omega Ratio Rank: 8
CONI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CONI Martin Ratio Rank: 4

EMTY

EMTY Risk / Return Rank: 10
EMTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
EMTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
EMTY Omega Ratio Rank: 10
EMTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
EMTY Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CONI vs. EMTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF (CONI) and ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CONI	EMTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.42	0.09	-0.51
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.14	0.24	-0.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.03	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	0.11	-0.89
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.00	0.20	-1.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CONI vs. EMTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CONI Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the EMTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CONI and EMTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CONI	EMTY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.42	0.09	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.58	-0.43	-0.15

Drawdowns

CONI vs. EMTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CONI drawdown since its inception was -94.53%, which is greater than EMTY's maximum drawdown of -77.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONI and EMTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	CONI	EMTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.53%	-77.62%	-16.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-75.37%	-14.00%	-61.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-30.83%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.04%	-74.77%	-16.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-73.27%	-54.01%	-19.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	58.67%	8.11%	+50.56%

Volatility

CONI vs. EMTY - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF (CONI) has a higher volatility of 39.64% compared to ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY) at 6.00%. This indicates that CONI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CONI	EMTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	39.64%	6.00%	+33.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	109.07%	12.40%	+96.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	140.01%	17.71%	+122.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	127.57%	22.36%	+105.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	127.57%	25.67%	+101.90%

CONI vs. EMTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CONI has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than EMTY's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

CONI vs. EMTY - Dividend Comparison

CONI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than EMTY's 3.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CONI GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF	1.20%	0.87%	1.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF	3.45%	3.83%	6.00%	4.41%	0.65%	0.00%	0.07%	0.82%	0.62%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CONI and EMTY in my portfolio?

CONI and EMTY have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CONI or EMTY?

CONI has higher volatility (39.64%) compared to EMTY (6.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONI dropped -94.53% vs EMTY's -77.62%.

Which ETF is better, CONI or EMTY?

On 1-year performance, EMTY leads with 1.60% vs -58.67% for CONI. On fees, EMTY is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, EMTY has been the lower-risk option at 6.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CONI or EMTY?

Over the 1-year period, EMTY has performed better with a 1.60% return vs -58.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CONI or EMTY?

EMTY is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for CONI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CONI or EMTY?

EMTY has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 1.20% for CONI.

What is the main difference between CONI and EMTY?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for CONI and 0.66% for EMTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.