COMX.L vs. GGRG.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

COMX.L (WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF) and GGRG.L (WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - COMX.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity, while GGRG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, COMX.L returned 13.55%/yr vs 10.59%/yr for GGRG.L. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COMX.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for GGRG.L.

Performance

COMX.L vs. GGRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF (COMX.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COMX.L achieves a 26.39% return, which is significantly higher than GGRG.L's 5.05% return.

COMX.L

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -0.52%
• YTD: 26.39%
• 6M: 24.79%
• 1Y: 40.20%
• 3Y*: 13.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GGRG.L

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 4.21%
• YTD: 5.05%
• 6M: 5.64%
• 1Y: 17.99%
• 3Y*: 10.59%
• 5Y*: 9.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COMX.L vs. GGRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
COMX.L WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF	26.39%	8.58%	6.24%	-12.51%	28.76%	-25.70%
GGRG.L WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc	5.05%	8.36%	11.10%	11.54%	-3.39%	3.83%

Correlation

The correlation between COMX.L and GGRG.L is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2021	0.08

The correlation between COMX.L and GGRG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

COMX.L vs. GGRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COMX.L

COMX.L Risk / Return Rank: 34
COMX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
COMX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
COMX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 62
COMX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
COMX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 23

GGRG.L

GGRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 46
GGRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
GGRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
GGRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 48
GGRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
GGRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COMX.L vs. GGRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF (COMX.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	COMX.L	GGRG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	1.63	-0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	2.37	-0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.30	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	2.06	-0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.06	7.93	-4.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

COMX.L vs. GGRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COMX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the GGRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COMX.L and GGRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COMX.L	GGRG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	1.63	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.92	-0.78

Drawdowns

COMX.L vs. GGRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COMX.L drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, which is greater than GGRG.L's maximum drawdown of -22.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMX.L and GGRG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	COMX.L	GGRG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.64%	-22.15%	-6.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.58%	-8.70%	-16.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.58%	-16.17%	-9.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.81%	0.00%	-3.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.64%	-2.91%	-14.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.10%	2.26%	+10.84%

Volatility

COMX.L vs. GGRG.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF (COMX.L) has a higher volatility of 6.14% compared to WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L) at 2.65%. This indicates that COMX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COMX.L	GGRG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.14%	2.65%	+3.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.05%	7.98%	+8.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.18%	11.02%	+34.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.36%	12.13%	+20.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.36%	13.52%	+18.84%

COMX.L vs. GGRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

COMX.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than GGRG.L's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

COMX.L vs. GGRG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither COMX.L nor GGRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COMX.L and GGRG.L in my portfolio?

COMX.L and GGRG.L have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, COMX.L or GGRG.L?

On fees, COMX.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, COMX.L or GGRG.L?

COMX.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for GGRG.L.

What is the main difference between COMX.L and GGRG.L?

COMX.L is categorized as Commodities, while GGRG.L is Global Equities. COMX.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity, while GGRG.L tracks WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for COMX.L and 0.38% for GGRG.L.