PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COMX.L vs. BCOG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

COMX.L vs. BCOG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF (COMX.L) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

COMX.L vs. BCOG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
COMX.L
WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF
24.07%8.58%6.24%-12.51%28.76%-25.70%
BCOG.L
L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF
24.31%8.16%6.13%-12.32%29.36%-1.23%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with COMX.L having a 24.07% return and BCOG.L slightly higher at 24.31%.


COMX.L

1D
-2.16%
1M
9.72%
YTD
24.07%
6M
32.13%
1Y
26.98%
3Y*
10.81%
5Y*
10Y*

BCOG.L

1D
-2.15%
1M
9.29%
YTD
24.31%
6M
32.11%
1Y
26.91%
3Y*
10.75%
5Y*
14.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


COMX.L vs. BCOG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

COMX.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than BCOG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

COMX.L vs. BCOG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COMX.L
COMX.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
COMX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
COMX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

BCOG.L
BCOG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BCOG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCOG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCOG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BCOG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCOG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COMX.L vs. BCOG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF (COMX.L) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COMX.LBCOG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.60

1.61

-1.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

2.17

-0.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.30

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

3.12

-2.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.10

7.02

-4.92

COMX.L vs. BCOG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COMX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the BCOG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COMX.L and BCOG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COMX.LBCOG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

1.61

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.51

-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between COMX.L and BCOG.L is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

COMX.L vs. BCOG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither COMX.L nor BCOG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

COMX.L vs. BCOG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COMX.L drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, roughly equal to the maximum BCOG.L drawdown of -28.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMX.L and BCOG.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


COMX.LBCOG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.64%

-28.15%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.58%

-9.54%

-16.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.63%

-2.15%

-2.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.16%

-11.83%

-6.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.08%

3.80%

+9.28%

Volatility

COMX.L vs. BCOG.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF (COMX.L) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L) have volatilities of 8.13% and 7.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


COMX.LBCOG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.13%

7.99%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.08%

13.19%

+29.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.48%

16.68%

+27.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.60%

16.45%

+16.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.60%

15.47%

+17.13%