PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COMX.L vs. COPA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COMX.L vs. COPA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF (COMX.L) and WisdomTree Copper (COPA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

COMX.L is traded in GBp, while COPA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COPA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COMX.L achieves a 26.39% return, which is significantly higher than COPA.L's 14.05% return.


COMX.L

1D
0.78%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
26.39%
6M
24.79%
1Y
40.20%
3Y*
13.55%
5Y*
10Y*

COPA.L

1D
-2.27%
1M
10.14%
YTD
14.05%
6M
19.02%
1Y
31.69%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
11.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COMX.L vs. COPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
COMX.L
WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF
26.39%8.58%6.24%-12.51%28.76%-25.70%
COPA.L
WisdomTree Copper
14.05%26.65%6.64%-2.47%-3.31%0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between COMX.L and COPA.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2021

0.34

The correlation between COMX.L and COPA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COMX.L vs. COPA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COMX.L
COMX.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
COMX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
COMX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

COPA.L
COPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
COPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
COPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COMX.L vs. COPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF (COMX.L) and WisdomTree Copper (COPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COMX.LCOPA.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

0.98

-0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.52

1.30

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.24

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

1.32

+0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.06

2.92

+0.14

COMX.L vs. COPA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COMX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the COPA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COMX.L and COPA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COMX.LCOPA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

0.98

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.14

0.00

Drawdowns

COMX.L vs. COPA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COMX.L drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, smaller than the maximum COPA.L drawdown of -58.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMX.L and COPA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COMX.LCOPA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.64%

-58.32%

+29.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.58%

-23.82%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.58%

-23.82%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.81%

-2.27%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.64%

-25.47%

+7.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.10%

10.84%

+2.26%

Volatility

COMX.L vs. COPA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF (COMX.L) is 6.14%, while WisdomTree Copper (COPA.L) has a volatility of 8.16%. This indicates that COMX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COMX.LCOPA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.14%

8.16%

-2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.05%

17.79%

-1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.18%

32.36%

+12.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.36%

24.66%

+7.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.36%

22.69%

+9.67%

COMX.L vs. COPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

COMX.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than COPA.L's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

COMX.L vs. COPA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither COMX.L nor COPA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


COMX.L and COPA.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COMX.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COMX.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COPA.L.

COMX.L is categorized as Commodities, while COPA.L is Metals. COMX.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity, while COPA.L tracks Bloomberg Copper Subindex. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for COMX.L and 0.49% for COPA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COMX.L and COPA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer