PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COMT vs. SDCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COMT vs. SDCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COMT achieves a 39.67% return, which is significantly higher than SDCI's 28.92% return.


COMT

1D
0.78%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
39.67%
6M
39.06%
1Y
47.51%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
9.09%

SDCI

1D
0.18%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
28.92%
6M
26.57%
1Y
40.79%
3Y*
23.74%
5Y*
20.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COMT vs. SDCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
39.67%6.07%5.96%-6.56%19.45%36.88%-18.66%10.81%-11.82%
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
28.92%17.60%17.91%-0.88%33.23%36.52%-10.61%-2.36%-13.91%

Correlation

The correlation between COMT and SDCI is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2018

0.77

The correlation between COMT and SDCI shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.89 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

COMT vs. SDCI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
COMT
SDCI

Financial Services

100.0%
15.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

COMT
100.0%
SDCI
15.4%

Basic Materials

COMT

-

SDCI

-

Communication Services

COMT

-

SDCI

-

Consumer Cyclical

COMT

-

SDCI

-

Consumer Defensive

COMT

-

SDCI

-

Energy

COMT

-

SDCI

-

Healthcare

COMT

-

SDCI

-

Industrials

COMT

-

SDCI

-

Real Estate

COMT

-

SDCI

-

Technology

COMT

-

SDCI

-

Utilities

COMT

-

SDCI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COMT vs. SDCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COMT
COMT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SDCI
SDCI Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SDCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDCI Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SDCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDCI Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COMT vs. SDCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COMTSDCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.41

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.95

4.53

+1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.11

16.31

-2.20

COMT vs. SDCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COMT Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the SDCI Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COMT and SDCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COMTSDCIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.44

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

1.10

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.68

-0.47

Drawdowns

COMT vs. SDCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COMT drawdown since its inception was -51.89%, which is greater than SDCI's maximum drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMT and SDCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COMTSDCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.89%

-45.79%

-6.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.02%

-9.04%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

-11.96%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.00%

-18.55%

-10.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.82%

-3.04%

-1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.07%

-11.58%

-12.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

2.51%

+0.87%

Volatility

COMT vs. SDCI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a higher volatility of 7.37% compared to USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) at 4.61%. This indicates that COMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COMTSDCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.37%

4.61%

+2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.80%

14.15%

+4.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.29%

16.83%

+4.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.06%

18.46%

+2.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.89%

17.08%

+1.81%

COMT vs. SDCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

COMT has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than SDCI's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

COMT vs. SDCI - Dividend Comparison

COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, more than SDCI's 2.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
5.54%7.74%4.90%5.19%29.79%17.79%0.36%2.61%11.65%5.16%0.52%1.44%
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
2.85%3.68%5.92%3.46%33.49%19.26%0.20%0.93%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


COMT and SDCI have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to SDCI (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COMT dropped -51.89% vs SDCI's -45.79%.

On 5-year performance, SDCI leads with 20.15% vs 13.50% for COMT. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, SDCI has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SDCI has performed better with a 20.15% return vs 13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SDCI.

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 2.85% for SDCI.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Wainwright, Inc.. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for COMT and 0.70% for SDCI.

SDCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COMT and SDCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer