PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COMP vs. URBN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COMP vs. URBN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Compass, Inc. (COMP) and Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COMP achieves a 4.73% return, which is significantly higher than URBN's -7.03% return.


COMP

1D
2.69%
1M
3.94%
6M
-16.95%
YTD
4.73%
1Y
55.26%
3Y*
38.24%
5Y*
-4.45%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-11.55%

URBN

1D
0.52%
1M
-3.25%
6M
3.83%
YTD
-7.03%
1Y
-4.63%
3Y*
27.09%
5Y*
13.94%
10Y*
8.67%
ALL TIME*
10.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$135.13M$175.30M$136.09M
$86.47M$85.51M$88.92M

COMP vs. URBN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
COMP
Compass, Inc.
4.73%80.68%55.59%61.37%-74.37%-57.22%
URBN
Urban Outfitters, Inc.
-7.03%37.14%53.77%49.64%-18.77%-21.05%

Correlation

The correlation between COMP and URBN is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021

0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap

COMP:

$6.73B

URBN:

$5.99B

EPS

COMP:

$0.02

URBN:

$5.18

PE Ratio

COMP:

509.65

URBN:

13.50

PS Ratio

COMP:

0.87

URBN:

1.01

PB Ratio

COMP:

3.23

URBN:

2.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

COMP:

$8.31B

URBN:

$6.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

COMP:

$893.40M

URBN:

$2.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

COMP:

-$177.70M

URBN:

$603.32M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COMP vs. URBN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COMP
COMP Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
COMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMP Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
COMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMP Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

URBN
URBN Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
URBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
URBN Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
URBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
URBN Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COMP vs. URBN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Compass, Inc. (COMP) and Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COMPURBNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.02

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

-0.18

+1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.21

-0.32

+2.53

COMP vs. URBN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COMP Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the URBN Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COMP and URBN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COMP vs. URBN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COMP drawdown since its inception was -91.29%, which is greater than URBN's maximum drawdown of -83.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMP and URBN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COMPURBNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.29%

-83.96%

-7.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.81%

-26.32%

-24.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.24%

-28.53%

-28.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.25%

-55.83%

-33.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.91%

-15.39%

-32.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.74%

-32.48%

-35.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.05%

14.44%

+10.61%

Volatility

COMP vs. URBN - Volatility Comparison

Compass, Inc. (COMP) has a higher volatility of 18.54% compared to Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN) at 10.76%. This indicates that COMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URBN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COMPURBNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.54%

10.76%

+7.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.93%

26.96%

+26.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.17%

44.34%

+21.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.37%

47.34%

+33.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.84%

48.88%

+29.96%

Dividends

COMP vs. URBN - Dividend Comparison

Neither COMP nor URBN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

COMP vs. URBN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Compass, Inc. and Urban Outfitters, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
2.70B
1.48B
(COMP) Total Revenue
(URBN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

COMP vs. URBN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Compass, Inc. and Urban Outfitters, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April0
36.6%
Portfolio components
COMP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Compass, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

URBN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Urban Outfitters, Inc. reported a gross profit of 542.57M and revenue of 1.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.6%.

COMP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Compass, Inc. reported an operating income of -351.00M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in an operating margin of -13.0%.

URBN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Urban Outfitters, Inc. reported an operating income of 139.68M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

COMP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Compass, Inc. reported a net income of 22.00M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in a net margin of 0.8%.

URBN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Urban Outfitters, Inc. reported a net income of 115.71M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


COMP and URBN have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COMP has higher volatility (18.54%) compared to URBN (10.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COMP dropped -91.29% vs URBN's -83.96%.

COMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COMP and URBN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer