COMB vs. TAGS
Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) and Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS).
COMB and TAGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COMB is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on May 22, 2017. TAGS is a passively managed fund by Teucrium that tracks the performance of the Teucrium TAGS Index. It was launched on Mar 28, 2012.
Performance
COMB vs. TAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
COMB vs. TAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 24.42% | 15.12% | 5.24% | -7.75% | 14.56% | 26.34% | -2.95% | 7.02% | -11.41% | 4.98% |
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 10.65% | -8.76% | -14.57% | -6.11% | 16.25% | 27.05% | 8.19% | -4.53% | -7.10% | -6.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COMB achieves a 24.42% return, which is significantly higher than TAGS's 10.65% return.
COMB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 11.58%
- YTD
- 24.42%
- 6M
- 31.07%
- 1Y
- 31.68%
- 3Y*
- 13.75%
- 5Y*
- 13.49%
- 10Y*
- —
TAGS
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 10.65%
- 6M
- 8.56%
- 1Y
- 0.50%
- 3Y*
- -6.51%
- 5Y*
- 2.64%
- 10Y*
- -0.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COMB vs. TAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
COMB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TAGS's 0.21% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
COMB vs. TAGS — Risk / Return Rank
COMB
TAGS
COMB vs. TAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) and Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COMB | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 0.04 | +1.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.44 | 0.15 | +2.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.02 | +0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | 0.04 | +3.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.81 | 0.07 | +9.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COMB | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 0.04 | +1.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.16 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | -0.22 | +0.74 |
Correlation
The correlation between COMB and TAGS is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
COMB vs. TAGS - Dividend Comparison
COMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, while TAGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 7.27% | 9.05% | 2.48% | 6.57% | 30.85% | 15.83% | 0.07% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.20% |
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
COMB vs. TAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COMB drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, smaller than the maximum TAGS drawdown of -76.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMB and TAGS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| COMB | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.50% | -76.40% | +42.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.19% | -12.12% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.63% | -37.60% | +10.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -62.14% | +62.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.25% | -57.15% | +44.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 7.59% | -4.25% |
Volatility
COMB vs. TAGS - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) has a higher volatility of 7.51% compared to Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) at 4.78%. This indicates that COMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| COMB | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.51% | 4.78% | +2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.80% | 8.49% | +5.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.18% | 11.47% | +5.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 16.91% | -0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.05% | 18.34% | -3.29% |