PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COMB vs. NVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

COMB vs. NVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

COMB vs. NVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
COMB
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF
24.42%15.12%5.24%-2.69%
NVD
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF
5.59%-73.27%-93.09%-15.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COMB achieves a 24.42% return, which is significantly higher than NVD's 5.59% return.


COMB

1D
0.02%
1M
11.58%
YTD
24.42%
6M
31.07%
1Y
31.68%
3Y*
13.75%
5Y*
13.49%
10Y*

NVD

1D
-11.38%
1M
0.27%
YTD
5.59%
6M
-2.50%
1Y
-75.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


COMB vs. NVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

COMB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than NVD's 1.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

COMB vs. NVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COMB
COMB Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
COMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMB Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
COMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMB Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

NVD
NVD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COMB vs. NVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COMBNVDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.85

-0.92

+2.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.44

-1.62

+4.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

0.80

+0.55

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

-0.89

+4.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.81

-1.02

+10.83

COMB vs. NVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the NVD Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COMB and NVD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COMBNVDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

-0.92

+2.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

-0.85

+1.37

Correlation

The correlation between COMB and NVD is -0.08. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

COMB vs. NVD - Dividend Comparison

COMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, less than NVD's 11.20% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
COMB
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF
7.27%9.05%2.48%6.57%30.85%15.83%0.07%1.48%0.97%0.20%
NVD
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF
11.20%11.83%8.68%15.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

COMB vs. NVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COMB drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, smaller than the maximum NVD drawdown of -98.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMB and NVD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


COMBNVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.50%

-98.85%

+65.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.19%

-84.54%

+75.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-98.58%

+98.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.25%

-80.48%

+68.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

73.89%

-70.55%

Volatility

COMB vs. NVD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) is 7.51%, while GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) has a volatility of 21.28%. This indicates that COMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


COMBNVDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.51%

21.28%

-13.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.80%

52.32%

-38.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.18%

82.56%

-65.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.53%

93.63%

-77.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.05%

93.63%

-78.58%