COMB vs. BAR
Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) and GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR).
COMB and BAR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COMB is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on May 22, 2017. BAR is a passively managed fund by GraniteShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). It was launched on Aug 31, 2017.
Performance
COMB vs. BAR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
COMB vs. BAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 24.42% | 15.12% | 5.24% | -7.75% | 14.56% | 26.34% | -2.95% | 7.02% | -11.41% | 4.35% |
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust | 8.57% | 64.12% | 26.97% | 12.96% | -0.55% | -3.92% | 25.02% | 18.16% | -1.87% | -1.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COMB achieves a 24.42% return, which is significantly higher than BAR's 8.57% return.
COMB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 11.58%
- YTD
- 24.42%
- 6M
- 31.07%
- 1Y
- 31.68%
- 3Y*
- 13.75%
- 5Y*
- 13.49%
- 10Y*
- —
BAR
- 1D
- 3.76%
- 1M
- -11.05%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 21.20%
- 1Y
- 49.58%
- 3Y*
- 33.22%
- 5Y*
- 21.84%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COMB vs. BAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
COMB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BAR's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
COMB vs. BAR — Risk / Return Rank
COMB
BAR
COMB vs. BAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) and GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COMB | BAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 1.80 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.44 | 2.24 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.33 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | 2.70 | +0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.81 | 9.99 | -0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COMB | BAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 1.80 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 1.24 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.97 | -0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between COMB and BAR is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
COMB vs. BAR - Dividend Comparison
COMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, while BAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 7.27% | 9.05% | 2.48% | 6.57% | 30.85% | 15.83% | 0.07% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.20% |
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
COMB vs. BAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COMB drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, which is greater than BAR's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMB and BAR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| COMB | BAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.50% | -21.53% | -11.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.19% | -19.19% | +10.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.63% | -20.91% | -5.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -13.22% | +13.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.25% | -6.29% | -5.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 5.19% | -1.85% |
Volatility
COMB vs. BAR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) is 7.51%, while GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) has a volatility of 11.01%. This indicates that COMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| COMB | BAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.51% | 11.01% | -3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.80% | 24.13% | -10.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.18% | 27.63% | -10.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 17.65% | -1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.05% | 16.30% | -1.25% |