PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COM vs. SPUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COM vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COM achieves a 15.98% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 20.19% return.


COM

1D
-0.01%
1M
3.62%
6M
12.15%
YTD
15.98%
1Y
25.71%
3Y*
8.10%
5Y*
8.38%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.03%

SPUU

1D
2.97%
1M
3.22%
6M
15.98%
YTD
20.19%
1Y
42.24%
3Y*
34.65%
5Y*
18.35%
10Y*
23.85%
ALL TIME*
21.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.46M$1.65M$5.10M
$4.50M$4.98M$4.51M

COM vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COM
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF
15.98%7.72%5.81%-2.09%9.17%28.00%6.63%-0.18%-0.03%-1.97%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
20.19%26.55%44.25%47.28%-38.72%61.27%21.85%66.84%-14.59%29.86%

Correlation

The correlation between COM and SPUU is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2017

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COM vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

COM
COM Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
COM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
COM Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
COM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
COM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SPUU
SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

COM vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COMSPUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.28

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

2.33

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.17

9.41

+0.76

COM vs. SPUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COM Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is higher than the SPUU Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COM and SPUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COM vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COM drawdown since its inception was -15.95%, smaller than the maximum SPUU drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COM and SPUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COMSPUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.95%

-59.35%

+43.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.63%

-18.19%

+10.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.50%

-35.18%

+26.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.02%

-46.59%

+32.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.70%

-0.97%

-2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.26%

-9.43%

+3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

4.50%

-1.96%

Volatility

COM vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) is 2.00%, while Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) has a volatility of 7.66%. This indicates that COM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COMSPUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

7.66%

-5.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.48%

20.55%

-13.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.08%

25.83%

-15.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.44%

33.73%

-24.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.73%

35.81%

-26.08%

COM vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

COM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

COM vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison

COM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, more than SPUU's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COM
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF
2.51%2.99%3.88%3.80%8.59%10.32%0.13%1.09%2.36%0.09%0.00%0.00%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
1.31%1.63%0.55%0.83%0.88%3.04%8.03%1.80%5.50%6.96%8.08%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


COM and SPUU have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPUU has higher volatility (7.66%) compared to COM (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COM dropped -15.95% vs SPUU's -59.35%.

On 5-year performance, SPUU leads with 18.35% vs 8.38% for COM. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, COM has been the lower-risk option at 2.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 18.35% return vs 8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for COM.

COM has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 1.31% for SPUU.

COM is categorized as Commodities, while SPUU is Leveraged Equities. COM tracks Auspice Broad Commodity ER Index, while SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200% Daily). Their fees differ too: 0.70% for COM and 0.60% for SPUU.

COM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COM and SPUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer