COM vs. CMDY
Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY).
COM and CMDY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COM is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the Auspice Broad Commodity ER Index. It was launched on Mar 30, 2017. CMDY is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2018. Both COM and CMDY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: COM or CMDY.
Key characteristics
| COM | CMDY | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.11% | 3.78% |
| 1Y Return | -3.12% | 2.34% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.17% | 5.90% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.07% | 7.07% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.44 | 0.10 |
| Daily Std Dev | 7.15% | 10.79% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.95% | -31.20% |
| Current Drawdown | -8.45% | -21.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between COM and CMDY is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
COM vs. CMDY - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, COM achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly higher than CMDY's 3.78% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COM vs. CMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
COM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CMDY's 0.28% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
COM vs. CMDY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
COM vs. CMDY - Dividend Comparison
COM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, less than CMDY's 4.91% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF | 4.63% | 3.80% | 8.59% | 10.32% | 0.13% | 1.09% | 2.36% | 0.09% |
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | 4.91% | 5.10% | 3.98% | 16.09% | 0.15% | 2.21% | 1.73% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
COM vs. CMDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COM drawdown since its inception was -15.95%, smaller than the maximum CMDY drawdown of -31.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COM and CMDY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
COM vs. CMDY - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) have volatilities of 2.83% and 2.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.