COM vs. CMDY
Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY).
COM and CMDY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COM is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the Auspice Broad Commodity ER Index. It was launched on Mar 30, 2017. CMDY is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2018. Both COM and CMDY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
COM vs. CMDY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
COM vs. CMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF | 14.18% | 7.72% | 5.81% | -2.09% | 9.17% | 28.00% | 6.63% | -0.18% | 0.60% |
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | 21.89% | 15.81% | 5.43% | -9.33% | 14.55% | 26.38% | 1.15% | 4.96% | -11.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COM achieves a 14.18% return, which is significantly lower than CMDY's 21.89% return.
COM
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 5.67%
- YTD
- 14.18%
- 6M
- 18.01%
- 1Y
- 17.69%
- 3Y*
- 6.92%
- 5Y*
- 10.16%
- 10Y*
- —
CMDY
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 8.85%
- YTD
- 21.89%
- 6M
- 27.68%
- 1Y
- 29.42%
- 3Y*
- 12.60%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COM vs. CMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
COM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CMDY's 0.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
COM vs. CMDY — Risk / Return Rank
COM
CMDY
COM vs. CMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COM | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | 1.80 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.24 | 2.36 | -0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.34 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | 3.17 | -0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.37 | 9.89 | -3.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COM | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 1.80 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 0.82 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.55 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between COM and CMDY is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
COM vs. CMDY - Dividend Comparison
COM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than CMDY's 10.58% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF | 2.48% | 2.99% | 3.88% | 3.80% | 8.59% | 10.32% | 0.13% | 1.09% | 2.36% | 0.09% |
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | 10.58% | 12.89% | 4.23% | 5.10% | 3.98% | 16.09% | 0.15% | 2.21% | 1.73% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
COM vs. CMDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COM drawdown since its inception was -15.95%, smaller than the maximum CMDY drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COM and CMDY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| COM | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.95% | -31.19% | +15.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.15% | -9.57% | +3.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.02% | -26.56% | +12.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -0.44% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.38% | -13.39% | +7.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 3.06% | -0.20% |
Volatility
COM vs. CMDY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) is 3.77%, while iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that COM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| COM | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 6.73% | -2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.21% | 13.01% | -4.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.35% | 16.42% | -6.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.71% | 15.63% | -5.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.76% | 14.54% | -4.78% |