PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COLD vs. AIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COLD vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Americold Realty Trust (COLD) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COLD achieves a 15.93% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 35.98% return.


COLD

1D
-2.47%
1M
22.67%
YTD
15.93%
6M
36.92%
1Y
-4.87%
3Y*
-17.44%
5Y*
-14.39%
10Y*

AIQ

1D
-1.40%
1M
21.10%
YTD
35.98%
6M
36.15%
1Y
69.19%
3Y*
37.50%
5Y*
19.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COLD vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
COLD
Americold Realty Trust
15.93%-36.17%-26.72%10.11%-10.89%-9.89%9.03%40.61%22.13%
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
35.98%31.89%24.11%55.39%-36.44%17.09%52.88%39.94%-14.03%

Correlation

The correlation between COLD and AIQ is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018

0.34

The correlation between COLD and AIQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COLD vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COLD
COLD Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
COLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
COLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
COLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
COLD Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

AIQ
AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COLD vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Americold Realty Trust (COLD) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COLDAIQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.49

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

4.22

-4.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.21

14.59

-14.80

COLD vs. AIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COLD Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the AIQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COLD and AIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COLDAIQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

3.02

-3.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.44

0.76

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.84

-0.81

Drawdowns

COLD vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COLD drawdown since its inception was -70.76%, which is greater than AIQ's maximum drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COLD and AIQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COLDAIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.76%

-44.66%

-26.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.15%

-16.47%

-24.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.06%

-26.35%

-40.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.76%

-44.66%

-26.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.17%

-1.40%

-54.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.29%

-9.80%

-12.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.24%

4.76%

+18.48%

Volatility

COLD vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison

Americold Realty Trust (COLD) has a higher volatility of 19.62% compared to Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) at 8.60%. This indicates that COLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COLDAIQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.62%

8.60%

+11.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.05%

18.46%

+16.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.71%

23.04%

+21.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.92%

25.33%

+7.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.18%

25.50%

+6.68%

Dividends

COLD vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison

COLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, more than AIQ's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
0.14%0.18%0.14%0.16%0.56%0.15%0.50%0.51%0.51%
COLD
Americold Realty Trust
6.30%7.15%4.11%2.91%3.11%2.68%2.25%2.28%2.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


COLD and AIQ have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COLD has higher volatility (19.62%) compared to AIQ (8.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COLD dropped -70.76% vs AIQ's -44.66%.

AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COLD and AIQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer