COLD vs. AIQ

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

COLD (Americold Realty Trust) is a stock, while AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Over the past 5 years, COLD returned -15.12%/yr vs 16.04%/yr for AIQ. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

COLD vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Americold Realty Trust (COLD) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COLD achieves a 12.21% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 24.64% return.

COLD

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -4.52%
• YTD: 12.21%
• 6M: 16.80%
• 1Y: -12.70%
• 3Y*: -19.31%
• 5Y*: -15.12%
• 10Y*: —

AIQ

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 24.64%
• 6M: 23.32%
• 1Y: 47.37%
• 3Y*: 32.44%
• 5Y*: 16.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COLD vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
COLD Americold Realty Trust	12.21%	-36.17%	-26.72%	10.11%	-10.89%	-9.89%	9.03%	40.61%	24.34%
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF	24.64%	31.89%	24.11%	55.39%	-36.44%	17.09%	52.88%	39.94%	-14.05%

Correlation

The correlation between COLD and AIQ is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018	0.33

The correlation between COLD and AIQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

COLD vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COLD

COLD Risk / Return Rank: 31
COLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
COLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
COLD Omega Ratio Rank: 30
COLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
COLD Martin Ratio Rank: 32

AIQ

AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 58
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 57
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COLD vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Americold Realty Trust (COLD) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COLD	AIQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.28	1.80	-2.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.14	2.30	-2.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.32	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	2.89	-3.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.60	9.23	-9.82

COLD vs. AIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COLD Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the AIQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COLD and AIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COLD vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COLD drawdown since its inception was -70.76%, which is greater than AIQ's maximum drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COLD and AIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	COLD	AIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.76%	-44.66%	-26.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.28%	-16.47%	-22.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-67.06%	-26.35%	-40.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-70.76%	-44.66%	-26.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.58%	-9.62%	-47.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.51%	-9.78%	-12.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.91%	5.15%	+16.76%

Volatility

COLD vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Americold Realty Trust (COLD) is 9.58%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a volatility of 15.09%. This indicates that COLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COLD	AIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.58%	15.09%	-5.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.50%	22.62%	+10.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.97%	26.52%	+18.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.05%	26.01%	+7.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.17%	25.84%	+6.33%

Dividends

COLD vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison

COLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, more than AIQ's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF	0.15%	0.18%	0.14%	0.16%	0.56%	0.15%	0.50%	0.51%	0.51%
COLD Americold Realty Trust	6.51%	7.15%	4.11%	2.91%	3.11%	2.68%	2.25%	2.28%	2.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COLD and AIQ in my portfolio?

COLD and AIQ have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COLD or AIQ?

AIQ has higher volatility (15.09%) compared to COLD (9.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COLD dropped -70.76% vs AIQ's -44.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.