COIW vs. AMDY
COIW (COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF) and AMDY (YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, COIW returned -71.27% vs 153.57% for AMDY. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COIW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for AMDY.
Performance
COIW vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COIW achieves a -38.16% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 95.56% return.
COIW
- 1D
- -2.97%
- 1M
- -6.46%
- 6M
- -42.90%
- YTD
- -38.16%
- 1Y
- -71.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDY
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -1.93%
- 6M
- 88.48%
- YTD
- 95.56%
- 1Y
- 153.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COIW vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF | -38.16% | -25.92% |
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF | 95.56% | 60.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between COIW and AMDY is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COIW vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank
COIW
AMDY
COIW vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COIW | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.42 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | 5.60 | -6.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | 12.40 | -13.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COIW vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COIW drawdown since its inception was -75.01%, which is greater than AMDY's maximum drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIW and AMDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COIW | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.01% | -53.92% | -21.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.01% | -27.59% | -47.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.00% | -12.17% | -59.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.87% | -17.48% | -23.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 52.78% | 12.44% | +40.34% |
Volatility
COIW vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison
COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) has a higher volatility of 19.80% compared to YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) at 16.56%. This indicates that COIW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COIW | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.80% | 16.56% | +3.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.31% | 45.42% | +18.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.05% | 57.50% | +24.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 89.57% | 47.20% | +42.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.57% | 47.20% | +42.37% |
COIW vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
COIW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 1.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
COIW vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison
COIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 229.45%, more than AMDY's 74.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF | 74.51% | 80.68% | 109.98% | 6.68% |
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF | 229.45% | 120.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COIW and AMDY have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COIW has higher volatility (19.80%) compared to AMDY (16.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COIW dropped -75.01% vs AMDY's -53.92%.
On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 153.57% vs -71.27% for COIW. On fees, COIW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, AMDY has been the lower-risk option at 16.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 153.57% return vs -71.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COIW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for AMDY.
COIW has the higher dividend yield at 229.45%, compared with 74.51% for AMDY.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COIW and 1.23% for AMDY.
AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COIW and AMDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer