COII vs. DFNM
COII (REX COIN Growth & Income ETF) and DFNM (Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX Shares, while DFNM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, COII returned -61.20% vs 4.87% for DFNM. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. COII charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for DFNM.
Performance
COII vs. DFNM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COII achieves a -40.76% return, which is significantly lower than DFNM's 1.14% return.
COII
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -17.01%
- YTD
- -40.76%
- 6M
- -44.80%
- 1Y
- -61.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFNM
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 4.87%
- 3Y*
- 3.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COII vs. DFNM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COII REX COIN Growth & Income ETF | -40.76% | -26.88% |
DFNM Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF | 1.14% | 3.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between COII and DFNM is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COII vs. DFNM — Risk / Return Rank
COII
DFNM
COII vs. DFNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX COIN Growth & Income ETF (COII) and Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF (DFNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COII | DFNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.63 | -0.81 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 2.66 | -3.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | 9.53 | -10.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COII vs. DFNM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COII drawdown since its inception was -72.22%, which is greater than DFNM's maximum drawdown of -6.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COII and DFNM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COII | DFNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.22% | -6.99% | -65.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.22% | -1.84% | -70.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.51% | -0.50% | -70.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.53% | -1.94% | -38.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.75% | 0.51% | +47.24% |
Volatility
COII vs. DFNM - Volatility Comparison
REX COIN Growth & Income ETF (COII) has a higher volatility of 17.23% compared to Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF (DFNM) at 0.51%. This indicates that COII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COII | DFNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.23% | 0.51% | +16.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.90% | 1.33% | +50.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.44% | 1.74% | +65.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.56% | 2.53% | +65.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.56% | 2.53% | +65.03% |
COII vs. DFNM - Expense Ratio Comparison
COII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DFNM's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
COII vs. DFNM - Dividend Comparison
COII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 94.11%, more than DFNM's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COII REX COIN Growth & Income ETF | 94.11% | 41.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DFNM Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF | 2.90% | 2.94% | 2.74% | 2.39% | 1.16% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COII and DFNM have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COII has higher volatility (17.23%) compared to DFNM (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COII dropped -72.22% vs DFNM's -6.99%.
On 1-year performance, DFNM leads with 4.87% vs -61.20% for COII. On fees, DFNM is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, DFNM has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DFNM has performed better with a 4.87% return vs -61.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFNM is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COII.
COII has the higher dividend yield at 94.11%, compared with 2.90% for DFNM.
COII is categorized as Derivative Income, while DFNM is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COII and 0.17% for DFNM.
DFNM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COII and DFNM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer