PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COII vs. ETU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COII vs. ETU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX COIN Growth & Income ETF (COII) and T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COII achieves a -40.76% return, which is significantly higher than ETU's -76.65% return.


COII

1D
0.00%
1M
-17.01%
YTD
-40.76%
6M
-44.80%
1Y
-61.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ETU

1D
-8.42%
1M
-38.50%
YTD
-76.65%
6M
-76.71%
1Y
-72.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COII vs. ETU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
COII
REX COIN Growth & Income ETF
-40.76%-26.88%
ETU
T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF
-76.65%-12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between COII and ETU is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025

0.69

The correlation between COII and ETU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COII vs. ETU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COII
COII Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
COII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COII Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
COII Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
COII Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
COII Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

ETU
ETU Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ETU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETU Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETU Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ETU Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETU Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COII vs. ETU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX COIN Growth & Income ETF (COII) and T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COIIETUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

0.96

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.85

-0.78

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.28

-1.12

-0.17

COII vs. ETU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COII Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the ETU Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COII and ETU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COII vs. ETU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COII drawdown since its inception was -72.22%, smaller than the maximum ETU drawdown of -94.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COII and ETU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COIIETUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.22%

-94.77%

+22.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.22%

-93.62%

+21.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.51%

-94.32%

+23.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.53%

-63.23%

+22.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.75%

65.25%

-17.50%

Volatility

COII vs. ETU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for REX COIN Growth & Income ETF (COII) is 17.23%, while T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU) has a volatility of 40.95%. This indicates that COII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COIIETUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.23%

40.95%

-23.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.90%

95.00%

-43.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.44%

138.04%

-70.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.56%

146.26%

-78.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.56%

146.26%

-78.70%

COII vs. ETU - Expense Ratio Comparison

COII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ETU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

COII vs. ETU - Dividend Comparison

COII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 94.11%, more than ETU's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
COII
REX COIN Growth & Income ETF
94.11%41.52%0.00%
ETU
T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF
0.01%0.00%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


COII and ETU have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETU has higher volatility (40.95%) compared to COII (17.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COII dropped -72.22% vs ETU's -94.77%.

On 1-year performance, COII leads with -61.20% vs -72.89% for ETU. On fees, ETU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, COII has been the lower-risk option at 17.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, COII has performed better with a -61.20% return vs -72.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ETU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COII.

COII has the higher dividend yield at 94.11%, compared with 0.01% for ETU.

COII is categorized as Derivative Income, while ETU is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COII and 0.95% for ETU.

ETU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.53 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COII and ETU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer