PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COII vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COII vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX COIN Growth & Income ETF (COII) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COII achieves a -37.80% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return.


COII

1D
-7.35%
1M
-19.57%
YTD
-37.80%
6M
-48.84%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BNO

1D
1.99%
1M
-10.29%
YTD
90.47%
6M
86.00%
1Y
91.89%
3Y*
27.93%
5Y*
24.16%
10Y*
13.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COII vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
COII
REX COIN Growth & Income ETF
-37.80%-25.89%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
90.47%1.83%

Correlation

The correlation between COII and BNO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025

-0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COII vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COII

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COII vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX COIN Growth & Income ETF (COII) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

COII vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COIIBNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.79

0.14

-0.93

Drawdowns

COII vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COII drawdown since its inception was -72.22%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COII and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COIIBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.22%

-87.06%

+14.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.04%

-10.29%

-58.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.11%

-40.17%

+1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.45%

Volatility

COII vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COIIBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.48%

41.46%

+27.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.48%

35.38%

+33.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.48%

36.68%

+31.80%

COII vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

COII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

COII vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

COII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 92.44%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%
COII
REX COIN Growth & Income ETF
92.44%41.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


COII and BNO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BNO is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BNO is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COII.

COII has the higher dividend yield at 92.44%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

COII is categorized as Derivative Income, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COII and 0.90% for BNO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COII and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer