PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COII.L vs. 3MSF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COII.L vs. 3MSF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP (3MSF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with COII.L having a -44.56% return and 3MSF.L slightly lower at -45.14%.


COII.L

1D
-0.71%
1M
-12.47%
YTD
-44.56%
6M
-52.15%
1Y
-65.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

3MSF.L

1D
-11.81%
1M
6.51%
YTD
-45.14%
6M
-44.62%
1Y
-44.21%
3Y*
-9.44%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COII.L vs. 3MSF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
COII.L
IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP
-44.56%-47.27%15.90%
3MSF.L
Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP
-45.14%-1.14%-3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between COII.L and 3MSF.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COII.L vs. 3MSF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COII.L
COII.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
COII.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COII.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
COII.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
COII.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
COII.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

3MSF.L
3MSF.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
3MSF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3MSF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
3MSF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
3MSF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
3MSF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COII.L vs. 3MSF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP (3MSF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COII.L3MSF.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

0.96

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.88

-0.56

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.34

-0.93

-0.41

COII.L vs. 3MSF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COII.L Sharpe Ratio is -1.09, which is lower than the 3MSF.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COII.L and 3MSF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COII.L3MSF.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.09

-0.50

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.81

0.13

-0.94

Drawdowns

COII.L vs. 3MSF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COII.L drawdown since its inception was -76.00%, smaller than the maximum 3MSF.L drawdown of -81.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COII.L and 3MSF.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COII.L3MSF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.00%

-81.42%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.77%

-79.39%

+4.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-79.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.01%

-68.80%

-6.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.14%

-36.10%

+1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.16%

47.63%

+1.53%

Volatility

COII.L vs. 3MSF.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L) is 16.24%, while Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP (3MSF.L) has a volatility of 31.08%. This indicates that COII.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3MSF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COII.L3MSF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.24%

31.08%

-14.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.47%

75.06%

-33.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.26%

88.42%

-28.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.71%

80.52%

-21.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.71%

80.24%

-21.53%

COII.L vs. 3MSF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

COII.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than 3MSF.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

COII.L vs. 3MSF.L - Dividend Comparison

COII.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 105.73%, while 3MSF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
3MSF.L
Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP
0.00%0.00%0.00%
COII.L
IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP
105.73%191.72%18.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


COII.L and 3MSF.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COII.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COII.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3MSF.L.

COII.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while 3MSF.L is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for COII.L and 0.75% for 3MSF.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COII.L and 3MSF.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer