3MSF.L vs. MAGD.L
3MSF.L (Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP) and MAGD.L (IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP) are both exchange-traded funds - 3MSF.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX Leveraged 3X MSFT Index, while MAGD.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. 3MSF.L is passively managed, while MAGD.L is actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 3MSF.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for MAGD.L.
Performance
3MSF.L vs. MAGD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
3MSF.L is traded in GBp, while MAGD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MAGD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3MSF.L achieves a -45.14% return, which is significantly lower than MAGD.L's -17.47% return.
3MSF.L
- 1D
- -11.81%
- 1M
- 6.51%
- YTD
- -45.14%
- 6M
- -44.62%
- 1Y
- -44.21%
- 3Y*
- -9.44%
- 5Y*
- 0.77%
- 10Y*
- —
MAGD.L
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- YTD
- -17.47%
- 6M
- -18.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3MSF.L vs. MAGD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
3MSF.L Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP | -45.14% | -15.95% |
MAGD.L IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP | -17.47% | 13.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3MSF.L and MAGD.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3MSF.L vs. MAGD.L — Risk / Return Rank
3MSF.L
MAGD.L
3MSF.L vs. MAGD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP (3MSF.L) and IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP (MAGD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3MSF.L | MAGD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3MSF.L | MAGD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | -0.33 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
3MSF.L vs. MAGD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3MSF.L drawdown since its inception was -81.42%, which is greater than MAGD.L's maximum drawdown of -28.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3MSF.L and MAGD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3MSF.L | MAGD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.42% | -28.32% | -53.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.80% | -26.07% | -42.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.10% | -12.14% | -23.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.63% | — | — |
Volatility
3MSF.L vs. MAGD.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3MSF.L | MAGD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.08% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 75.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.42% | 22.19% | +66.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.52% | 22.19% | +58.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.24% | 22.19% | +58.05% |
3MSF.L vs. MAGD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
3MSF.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGD.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
3MSF.L vs. MAGD.L - Dividend Comparison
3MSF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
3MSF.L Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MAGD.L IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP | 0.39% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
3MSF.L and MAGD.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MAGD.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MAGD.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3MSF.L.
3MSF.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MAGD.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3MSF.L and 0.45% for MAGD.L.
Find the right allocation for 3MSF.L and MAGD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer