PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3MSF.L vs. 3NIE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3MSF.L vs. 3NIE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP (3MSF.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities (3NIE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3MSF.L is traded in GBp, while 3NIE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3NIE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3MSF.L achieves a -45.14% return, which is significantly lower than 3NIE.L's -27.67% return.


3MSF.L

1D
-11.81%
1M
6.51%
YTD
-45.14%
6M
-44.62%
1Y
-44.21%
3Y*
-9.44%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*

3NIE.L

1D
-13.30%
1M
-12.04%
YTD
-27.67%
6M
-3.16%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3MSF.L vs. 3NIE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
3MSF.L
Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP
-45.14%4.92%
3NIE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities
-27.67%-23.05%

Correlation

The correlation between 3MSF.L and 3NIE.L is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025

0.03

3MSF.L vs. 3NIE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
3MSF.L
3NIE.L

Technology

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

100.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

3MSF.L
100.0%
3NIE.L

-

Basic Materials

3MSF.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Communication Services

3MSF.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

3MSF.L

-

3NIE.L
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

3MSF.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Energy

3MSF.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Financial Services

3MSF.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Healthcare

3MSF.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Industrials

3MSF.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Real Estate

3MSF.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Utilities

3MSF.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3MSF.L vs. 3NIE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3MSF.L
3MSF.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
3MSF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3MSF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
3MSF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
3MSF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
3MSF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

3NIE.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3MSF.L vs. 3NIE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP (3MSF.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities (3NIE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3MSF.L3NIE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.93

3MSF.L vs. 3NIE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3MSF.L3NIE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

-0.39

+0.52

Drawdowns

3MSF.L vs. 3NIE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3MSF.L drawdown since its inception was -81.42%, which is greater than 3NIE.L's maximum drawdown of -60.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3MSF.L and 3NIE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3MSF.L3NIE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.42%

-60.99%

-20.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-79.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-79.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.80%

-48.43%

-20.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.10%

-36.78%

+0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.63%

Volatility

3MSF.L vs. 3NIE.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3MSF.L3NIE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

75.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.42%

175.61%

-87.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.52%

175.61%

-95.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.24%

175.61%

-95.37%

3MSF.L vs. 3NIE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3MSF.L and 3NIE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3MSF.L vs. 3NIE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3MSF.L nor 3NIE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3MSF.L and 3NIE.L have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3MSF.L and 3NIE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

3MSF.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X MSFT Index, while 3NIE.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x NIO Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3MSF.L and 3NIE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer