COIG vs. UNHU
COIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF) and UNHU (Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COIG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for UNHU.
Performance
COIG vs. UNHU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
COIG
- 1D
- -10.09%
- 1M
- -40.56%
- YTD
- -72.36%
- 6M
- -75.50%
- 1Y
- -91.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UNHU
- 1D
- 5.12%
- 1M
- 20.99%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COIG vs. UNHU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
COIG Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF | -47.01% |
UNHU Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF | 129.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between COIG and UNHU is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2026 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COIG vs. UNHU — Risk / Return Rank
COIG
UNHU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
COIG vs. UNHU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) and Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF (UNHU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COIG | UNHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COIG vs. UNHU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COIG drawdown since its inception was -93.79%, which is greater than UNHU's maximum drawdown of -11.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIG and UNHU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COIG | UNHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.79% | -11.68% | -82.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.79% | 0.00% | -93.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.42% | -2.74% | -50.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 69.59% | — | — |
Volatility
COIG vs. UNHU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COIG | UNHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.32% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 102.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 133.89% | 63.89% | +70.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 145.32% | 63.89% | +81.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 145.32% | 63.89% | +81.43% |
COIG vs. UNHU - Expense Ratio Comparison
COIG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHU's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
COIG vs. UNHU - Dividend Comparison
COIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UNHU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
COIG Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF | 0.00% |
UNHU Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COIG and UNHU have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for UNHU.
UNHU has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.00% for COIG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for COIG and 0.97% for UNHU.
Find the right allocation for COIG and UNHU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer