COHX vs. QTJL
COHX (Tradr 2X Long COHR Daily ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. COHX is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. COHX charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
COHX vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
COHX
- 1D
- 19.22%
- 1M
- -32.02%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QTJL
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- 6M
- 2.72%
- YTD
- 4.03%
- 1Y
- 13.57%
- 3Y*
- 17.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.12%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.62%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.24M | $11.92M | $40.90M | |
| $205.17K | $322.53K | $250.53K |
COHX vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
COHX Tradr 2X Long COHR Daily ETF | 10.59% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 3.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between COHX and QTJL is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COHX vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
COHX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QTJL
COHX vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long COHR Daily ETF (COHX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COHX | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.61 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.83 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COHX vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COHX drawdown since its inception was -77.53%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COHX and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COHX | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.53% | -33.40% | -44.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.96% | -3.26% | -59.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.62% | -7.74% | -17.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.74% | — |
Volatility
COHX vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COHX | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 190.24% | 11.73% | +178.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 190.24% | 20.45% | +169.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 190.24% | 20.30% | +169.94% |
COHX vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
COHX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
COHX vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither COHX nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
COHX and QTJL have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for COHX.
COHX and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for COHX and 0.79% for QTJL.
Find the right allocation for COHX and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer