COHX vs. RGTU
COHX (Tradr 2X Long COHR Daily ETF) and RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. COHX is passively managed, while RGTU is actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COHX charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for RGTU.
Performance
COHX vs. RGTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
COHX
- 1D
- 5.19%
- 1M
- -2.60%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RGTU
- 1D
- -16.33%
- 1M
- -52.54%
- YTD
- -55.83%
- 6M
- -64.36%
- 1Y
- -20.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COHX vs. RGTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
COHX Tradr 2X Long COHR Daily ETF | 132.11% |
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | -3.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between COHX and RGTU is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COHX vs. RGTU — Risk / Return Rank
COHX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RGTU
COHX vs. RGTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long COHR Daily ETF (COHX) and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COHX | RGTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.21 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.27 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COHX vs. RGTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COHX drawdown since its inception was -50.30%, smaller than the maximum RGTU drawdown of -96.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COHX and RGTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COHX | RGTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.30% | -96.96% | +46.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -96.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.27% | -95.06% | +72.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.45% | -63.73% | +46.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 73.57% | — |
Volatility
COHX vs. RGTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COHX | RGTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 64.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 141.95% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 186.03% | 219.15% | -33.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 186.03% | 219.15% | -33.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 186.03% | 219.15% | -33.12% |
COHX vs. RGTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
COHX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than RGTU's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
COHX vs. RGTU - Dividend Comparison
COHX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
COHX Tradr 2X Long COHR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | 46.70% | 20.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COHX and RGTU have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RGTU is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RGTU is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for COHX.
RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 46.70%, compared with 0.00% for COHX.
Their fees differ too: 1.49% for COHX and 1.30% for RGTU.
Find the right allocation for COHX and RGTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer