CNYB.L vs. EIMI.L
CNYB.L (iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and EIMI.L (iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CNYB.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index, while EIMI.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CNYB.L returned 3.58%/yr vs 7.58%/yr for EIMI.L. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CNYB.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EIMI.L.
Performance
CNYB.L vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CNYB.L is traded in GBP, while EIMI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EIMI.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNYB.L achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly lower than EIMI.L's 18.15% return.
CNYB.L
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- 5.08%
- 1Y
- 7.11%
- 3Y*
- 4.85%
- 5Y*
- 3.58%
- 10Y*
- —
EIMI.L
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -6.90%
- 6M
- 12.65%
- YTD
- 18.15%
- 1Y
- 33.21%
- 3Y*
- 17.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
CNYB.L vs. EIMI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNYB.L iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 5.08% | -2.20% | 6.65% | -4.09% | 6.21% | 9.69% | -19.80% | 0.53% |
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | 18.15% | 22.75% | 9.23% | 5.48% | -10.12% | 0.29% | 15.31% | 0.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNYB.L and EIMI.L is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2019 | 0.01 |
The correlation between CNYB.L and EIMI.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNYB.L vs. EIMI.L — Risk / Return Rank
CNYB.L
EIMI.L
CNYB.L vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (CNYB.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNYB.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.31 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 3.12 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.13 | 9.00 | -2.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNYB.L vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNYB.L drawdown since its inception was -25.82%, smaller than the maximum EIMI.L drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNYB.L and EIMI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNYB.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.82% | -31.70% | +5.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.75% | -10.58% | +7.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.03% | -15.79% | +6.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.44% | -21.19% | +5.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.25% | -9.57% | +2.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.53% | -8.66% | -3.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | 3.68% | -2.52% |
Volatility
CNYB.L vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (CNYB.L) is 1.68%, while iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a volatility of 8.66%. This indicates that CNYB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIMI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNYB.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.68% | 8.66% | -6.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.69% | 18.40% | -13.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.29% | 20.32% | -14.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.66% | 17.17% | -9.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.48% | 18.54% | -7.06% |
CNYB.L vs. EIMI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNYB.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than EIMI.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNYB.L vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison
CNYB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, while EIMI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNYB.L iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.72% | 1.89% | 2.24% | 2.55% | 2.72% | 2.74% | 2.65% | 0.72% |
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CNYB.L and EIMI.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EIMI.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EIMI.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CNYB.L.
CNYB.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while EIMI.L is Emerging Markets Equities. CNYB.L tracks Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index, while EIMI.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CNYB.L and 0.18% for EIMI.L.
Find the right allocation for CNYB.L and EIMI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer