CNYA vs. DRGN
CNYA (iShares MSCI China A ETF) and DRGN (Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CNYA is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Inclusion Index, while DRGN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BITA China Generative AI Select Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CNYA charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for DRGN.
Performance
CNYA vs. DRGN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNYA achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly lower than DRGN's 16.56% return.
CNYA
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- 9.30%
- 6M
- 13.79%
- 1Y
- 37.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.00%
- 5Y*
- -1.06%
- 10Y*
- —
DRGN
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 16.56%
- 6M
- 18.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNYA vs. DRGN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 9.30% | 20.00% |
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF | 16.56% | 26.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNYA and DRGN is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNYA vs. DRGN — Risk / Return Rank
CNYA
DRGN
CNYA vs. DRGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNYA | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.20 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.02 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.02 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.84 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNYA | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 1.58 | -1.31 |
Drawdowns
CNYA vs. DRGN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNYA drawdown since its inception was -49.49%, which is greater than DRGN's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNYA and DRGN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNYA | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.49% | -20.86% | -28.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.42% | -7.05% | -6.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.69% | -7.93% | -12.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | — | — |
Volatility
CNYA vs. DRGN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNYA | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.42% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.30% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.32% | 34.85% | -17.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.81% | 34.85% | -11.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.56% | 34.85% | -11.29% |
CNYA vs. DRGN - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNYA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGN's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNYA vs. DRGN - Dividend Comparison
CNYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than DRGN's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 1.75% | 1.92% | 2.51% | 4.23% | 2.69% | 1.11% | 1.06% | 1.21% | 3.92% | 0.97% | 1.38% |
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF | 1.04% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CNYA and DRGN have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CNYA.
CNYA has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.04% for DRGN.
CNYA is categorized as China Equities, while DRGN is Technology Equities. CNYA tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index, while DRGN tracks BITA China Generative AI Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CNYA and 0.39% for DRGN.
Find the right allocation for CNYA and DRGN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer