PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNYA vs. DRGN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNYA vs. DRGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNYA achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly lower than DRGN's 16.56% return.


CNYA

1D
0.04%
1M
2.34%
YTD
9.30%
6M
13.79%
1Y
37.95%
3Y*
11.00%
5Y*
-1.06%
10Y*

DRGN

1D
0.42%
1M
5.53%
YTD
16.56%
6M
18.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNYA vs. DRGN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CNYA and DRGN is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025

0.70

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNYA vs. DRGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNYA
CNYA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CNYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNYA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CNYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNYA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

DRGN
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNYA vs. DRGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNYADRGNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.84

CNYA vs. DRGN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNYADRGNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

1.58

-1.31

Drawdowns

CNYA vs. DRGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNYA drawdown since its inception was -49.49%, which is greater than DRGN's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNYA and DRGN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNYADRGNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.49%

-20.86%

-28.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.42%

-7.05%

-6.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.69%

-7.93%

-12.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

Volatility

CNYA vs. DRGN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNYADRGNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.32%

34.85%

-17.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.81%

34.85%

-11.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.56%

34.85%

-11.29%

CNYA vs. DRGN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNYA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGN's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNYA vs. DRGN - Dividend Comparison

CNYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than DRGN's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CNYA
iShares MSCI China A ETF
1.75%1.92%2.51%4.23%2.69%1.11%1.06%1.21%3.92%0.97%1.38%
DRGN
Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF
1.04%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CNYA and DRGN have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CNYA.

CNYA has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.04% for DRGN.

CNYA is categorized as China Equities, while DRGN is Technology Equities. CNYA tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index, while DRGN tracks BITA China Generative AI Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CNYA and 0.39% for DRGN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNYA and DRGN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer