PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CNX1.L vs. 5QQE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CNX1.L vs. 5QQE.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CNX1.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and 5QQE.L (Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. CNX1.L is passively managed, while 5QQE.L is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CNX1.L returned 24.68%/yr vs 70.02%/yr for 5QQE.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CNX1.L charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 5QQE.L.

Performance

CNX1.L vs. 5QQE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) and Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR (5QQE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CNX1.L is traded in GBp, while 5QQE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 5QQE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNX1.L achieves a 19.85% return, which is significantly lower than 5QQE.L's 92.80% return.

CNX1.L

1D
-0.63%
1M
8.17%
YTD
19.85%
6M
17.68%
1Y
40.87%
3Y*
24.68%
5Y*
18.83%
10Y*
22.43%

5QQE.L

1D
-3.70%
1M
45.90%
YTD
92.80%
6M
79.88%
1Y
213.33%
3Y*
70.02%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNX1.L vs. 5QQE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CNX1.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		19.85%11.57%28.51%47.71%-25.53%1.71%
5QQE.L
Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR		92.71%-4.80%76.92%400.57%-95.65%16.32%

Correlation

The correlation between CNX1.L and 5QQE.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021

0.87

The correlation between CNX1.L and 5QQE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

CNX1.L vs. 5QQE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CNX1.L
5QQE.L

Technology

57.3%
54.2%

Communication Services

14.5%
15.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
7.6%

Healthcare

3.8%
4.2%

Industrials

2.8%
2.8%

Utilities

1.3%
1.4%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.2%

Energy

0.5%
0.6%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.1%

Technology

CNX1.L
57.3%
5QQE.L
54.2%

Communication Services

CNX1.L
14.5%
5QQE.L
15.5%

Consumer Cyclical

CNX1.L
11.6%
5QQE.L
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

CNX1.L
6.9%
5QQE.L
7.6%

Healthcare

CNX1.L
3.8%
5QQE.L
4.2%

Industrials

CNX1.L
2.8%
5QQE.L
2.8%

Utilities

CNX1.L
1.3%
5QQE.L
1.4%

Basic Materials

CNX1.L
1.1%
5QQE.L
1.2%

Energy

CNX1.L
0.5%
5QQE.L
0.6%

Financial Services

CNX1.L
0.2%
5QQE.L
0.2%

Real Estate

CNX1.L
0.1%
5QQE.L
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR

Often compared with CNX1.L:
CNX1.L vs. CNDX.LCNX1.L vs. EQQQ.LCNX1.L vs. IITU.LCNX1.L vs. EQGB.LCNX1.L vs. QQQCNX1.L vs. XNAQ.LCNX1.L vs. SXRV.DE
Often compared with 5QQE.L:
5QQE.L vs. 3XLE.L5QQE.L vs. 3XFE.L5QQE.L vs. KWE3.L5QQE.L vs. QQQ5QQE.L vs. 3SPY.L5QQE.L vs. NESG.L5QQE.L vs. 3KOR.L

Return for Risk

CNX1.L vs. 5QQE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CNX1.L
CNX1.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CNX1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
5QQE.L
5QQE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
5QQE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5QQE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
5QQE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
5QQE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
5QQE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNX1.L vs. 5QQE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) and Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR (5QQE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CNX1.L5QQE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.82
2.77

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.72
2.92

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.36

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

3.75

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.10

10.06

+1.04

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CNX1.L vs. 5QQE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNX1.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is comparable to the 5QQE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNX1.L and 5QQE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CNX1.L5QQE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

2.77

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.16

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

-0.04

+1.19

Drawdowns

CNX1.L vs. 5QQE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNX1.L drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, smaller than the maximum 5QQE.L drawdown of -95.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNX1.L and 5QQE.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CNX1.L5QQE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.56%

-95.85%

+68.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

-56.52%

+45.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.56%

-80.29%

+55.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.56%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.56%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-29.34%

+28.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-74.60%

+70.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

21.10%

-17.35%

Volatility

CNX1.L vs. 5QQE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) is 4.13%, while Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR (5QQE.L) has a volatility of 24.75%. This indicates that CNX1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 5QQE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CNX1.L5QQE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

24.75%

-20.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.38%

56.52%

-46.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.70%

76.65%

-61.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.16%

107.79%

-88.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.44%

107.79%

-88.35%

CNX1.L vs. 5QQE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNX1.L has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than 5QQE.L's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNX1.L vs. 5QQE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CNX1.L nor 5QQE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.92, CNX1.L and 5QQE.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CNX1.L is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CNX1.L is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 5QQE.L.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for CNX1.L and 0.75% for 5QQE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNX1.L and 5QQE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer