PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNTA vs. ASST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CNTA vs. ASST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Centessa Pharmaceuticals Limited (CNTA) and Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock (ASST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNTA achieves a 58.74% return, which is significantly higher than ASST's 3.05% return.


CNTA

1D
0.20%
1M
0.28%
YTD
58.74%
6M
34.58%
1Y
233.05%
3Y*
104.97%
5Y*
12.71%
10Y*

ASST

1D
9.27%
1M
-4.46%
YTD
3.05%
6M
-22.78%
1Y
-86.80%
3Y*
-49.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNTA vs. ASST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CNTA
Centessa Pharmaceuticals Limited
58.74%49.31%110.43%119.89%
ASST
Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock
3.05%50.46%-84.65%-82.00%

Correlation

The correlation between CNTA and ASST is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2023

0.12

Fundamentals

EPS

CNTA:

-$1.81

ASST:

-$25.54

PS Ratio

CNTA:

354.44

ASST:

71.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

CNTA:

$15.00M

ASST:

$5.73M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CNTA:

$15.00M

ASST:

-$7.43M

EBITDA (TTM)

CNTA:

-$227.27M

ASST:

-$304.63M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNTA vs. ASST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNTA
CNTA Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CNTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNTA Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CNTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNTA Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

ASST
ASST Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
ASST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASST Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASST Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ASST Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASST Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNTA vs. ASST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Centessa Pharmaceuticals Limited (CNTA) and Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock (ASST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNTAASSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

0.92

+0.77

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.90

-0.91

+9.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.63

-1.12

+25.74

CNTA vs. ASST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNTA Sharpe Ratio is 3.54, which is higher than the ASST Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNTA and ASST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNTAASSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54

-0.53

+4.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

-0.19

+0.37

Drawdowns

CNTA vs. ASST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNTA drawdown since its inception was -88.19%, smaller than the maximum ASST drawdown of -97.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNTA and ASST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNTAASSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.19%

-97.98%

+9.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.38%

-95.98%

+69.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.72%

-97.25%

+53.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-95.72%

+95.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.99%

-84.13%

+32.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.51%

77.69%

-68.18%

Volatility

CNTA vs. ASST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Centessa Pharmaceuticals Limited (CNTA) is 0.72%, while Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock (ASST) has a volatility of 26.35%. This indicates that CNTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNTAASSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.72%

26.35%

-25.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.27%

82.30%

-38.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.48%

164.70%

-98.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.09%

322.72%

-250.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.30%

322.72%

-250.42%

Dividends

CNTA vs. ASST - Dividend Comparison

Neither CNTA nor ASST has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CNTA vs. ASST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Centessa Pharmaceuticals Limited and Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00M10.00M15.00M202220232024202520260
2.76M
(CNTA) Total Revenue
(ASST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CNTA and ASST have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASST has higher volatility (26.35%) compared to CNTA (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNTA dropped -88.19% vs ASST's -97.98%.

CNTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNTA and ASST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer