CNSDX vs. MCIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Convertible Securities Fund (CNSDX) and Miller Convertible Bond Fund (MCIFX).
CNSDX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Jul 27, 1997. MCIFX is managed by Miller Investment. It was launched on Dec 26, 2007.
Performance
CNSDX vs. MCIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CNSDX vs. MCIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNSDX Invesco Convertible Securities Fund | 2.40% | 16.24% | 9.95% | 8.18% | -15.51% | 4.69% | 44.68% | 21.25% | -1.60% | 10.68% |
MCIFX Miller Convertible Bond Fund | -0.04% | 6.35% | 5.75% | 6.06% | -10.55% | 4.40% | 19.61% | 13.28% | -5.64% | 7.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNSDX achieves a 2.40% return, which is significantly higher than MCIFX's -0.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CNSDX has outperformed MCIFX with an annualized return of 9.97%, while MCIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.36% annualized return.
CNSDX
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- -3.94%
- YTD
- 2.40%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 22.33%
- 3Y*
- 11.66%
- 5Y*
- 4.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
MCIFX
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- YTD
- -0.04%
- 6M
- 1.40%
- 1Y
- 7.03%
- 3Y*
- 5.72%
- 5Y*
- 1.73%
- 10Y*
- 5.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNSDX vs. MCIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNSDX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than MCIFX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CNSDX vs. MCIFX — Risk / Return Rank
CNSDX
MCIFX
CNSDX vs. MCIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Convertible Securities Fund (CNSDX) and Miller Convertible Bond Fund (MCIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNSDX | MCIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.42 | 1.27 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.96 | 1.82 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.24 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 1.50 | +1.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.79 | 5.52 | +3.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNSDX | MCIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 1.27 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.28 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.77 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.72 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between CNSDX and MCIFX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CNSDX vs. MCIFX - Dividend Comparison
CNSDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.50%, more than MCIFX's 4.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNSDX Invesco Convertible Securities Fund | 11.50% | 11.77% | 3.46% | 1.46% | 3.97% | 28.36% | 10.96% | 5.21% | 12.65% | 4.57% | 3.74% | 2.74% |
MCIFX Miller Convertible Bond Fund | 4.87% | 4.10% | 4.12% | 3.55% | 3.99% | 7.69% | 3.43% | 2.96% | 5.31% | 5.59% | 2.45% | 2.46% |
Drawdowns
CNSDX vs. MCIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNSDX drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, which is greater than MCIFX's maximum drawdown of -29.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNSDX and MCIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNSDX | MCIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.33% | -29.19% | -10.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.09% | -4.53% | -3.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.73% | -14.75% | -7.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.19% | -17.36% | -6.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.44% | -3.53% | -1.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.94% | -3.91% | -3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 1.23% | +1.15% |
Volatility
CNSDX vs. MCIFX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Convertible Securities Fund (CNSDX) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to Miller Convertible Bond Fund (MCIFX) at 1.97%. This indicates that CNSDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CNSDX | MCIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 1.97% | +4.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.93% | 3.70% | +9.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.04% | 5.54% | +10.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.03% | 6.16% | +5.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.63% | 6.96% | +5.67% |