PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNSDX vs. ANNPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNSDX vs. ANNPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Convertible Securities Fund (CNSDX) and Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNSDX achieves a 24.06% return, which is significantly higher than ANNPX's 22.11% return. Over the past 10 years, CNSDX has underperformed ANNPX with an annualized return of 11.81%, while ANNPX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.66% annualized return.


CNSDX

1D
1.36%
1M
5.11%
YTD
24.06%
6M
21.42%
1Y
39.17%
3Y*
18.32%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
11.81%

ANNPX

1D
1.22%
1M
3.46%
YTD
22.11%
6M
20.06%
1Y
44.39%
3Y*
20.71%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
14.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNSDX vs. ANNPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNSDX
Invesco Convertible Securities Fund
24.06%16.24%9.95%8.18%-15.51%4.69%44.68%21.25%-1.60%10.68%
ANNPX
Virtus Convertible Fund
22.11%22.50%14.13%8.39%-18.65%4.96%55.99%26.45%2.76%15.22%

Correlation

The correlation between CNSDX and ANNPX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 1997

0.93

The correlation between CNSDX and ANNPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNSDX vs. ANNPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNSDX
CNSDX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CNSDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNSDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNSDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CNSDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNSDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

ANNPX
ANNPX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ANNPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANNPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANNPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ANNPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANNPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNSDX vs. ANNPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Convertible Securities Fund (CNSDX) and Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CNSDXANNPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.53

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.89

6.26

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.99

26.09

-9.11

CNSDX vs. ANNPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNSDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the ANNPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNSDX and ANNPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNSDX vs. ANNPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNSDX drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, smaller than the maximum ANNPX drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNSDX and ANNPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNSDXANNPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.33%

-55.61%

+16.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.09%

-7.15%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.32%

-13.67%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.73%

-26.85%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.19%

-27.36%

+3.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.90%

-17.43%

+10.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

1.71%

+0.61%

Volatility

CNSDX vs. ANNPX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Convertible Securities Fund (CNSDX) has a higher volatility of 6.65% compared to Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX) at 5.60%. This indicates that CNSDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANNPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNSDXANNPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.65%

5.60%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.68%

12.12%

+1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.62%

14.75%

+1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.47%

13.00%

-0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.94%

13.67%

-0.73%

CNSDX vs. ANNPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNSDX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than ANNPX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNSDX vs. ANNPX - Dividend Comparison

CNSDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.49%, more than ANNPX's 9.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANNPX
Virtus Convertible Fund
9.03%11.32%2.31%2.56%1.55%20.74%6.94%5.12%18.79%23.47%2.88%10.63%
CNSDX
Invesco Convertible Securities Fund
9.49%11.77%3.46%1.46%3.97%28.36%10.96%5.21%12.65%4.57%3.74%2.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, CNSDX and ANNPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CNSDX has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to ANNPX (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNSDX dropped -39.33% vs ANNPX's -55.61%.

ANNPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNSDX and ANNPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer