PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNSDX vs. ANNPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNSDX vs. ANNPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Convertible Securities Fund (CNSDX) and Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CNSDX having a 14.61% return and ANNPX slightly lower at 13.93%. Over the past 10 years, CNSDX has underperformed ANNPX with an annualized return of 10.55%, while ANNPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.40% annualized return.


CNSDX

1D
2.96%
1M
-3.26%
6M
8.67%
YTD
14.61%
1Y
23.05%
3Y*
14.50%
5Y*
6.35%
10Y*
10.55%
ALL TIME*
7.89%

ANNPX

1D
2.60%
1M
-2.60%
6M
9.03%
YTD
13.93%
1Y
29.08%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
7.14%
10Y*
13.40%
ALL TIME*
7.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CNSDX vs. ANNPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNSDX
Invesco Convertible Securities Fund
14.61%16.24%9.95%8.18%-15.51%4.69%44.68%21.25%-1.60%10.68%
ANNPX
Virtus Convertible Fund
13.93%22.50%14.13%8.39%-18.65%4.96%55.99%26.45%2.76%15.22%

Correlation

The correlation between CNSDX and ANNPX is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 1997

0.93

The correlation between CNSDX and ANNPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNSDX vs. ANNPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CNSDX
CNSDX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
CNSDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNSDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNSDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CNSDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNSDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

ANNPX
ANNPX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ANNPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANNPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANNPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ANNPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANNPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CNSDX vs. ANNPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Convertible Securities Fund (CNSDX) and Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CNSDXANNPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.30

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

3.05

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.22

11.64

-4.42

CNSDX vs. ANNPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNSDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the ANNPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNSDX and ANNPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNSDX vs. ANNPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNSDX drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, smaller than the maximum ANNPX drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNSDX and ANNPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNSDXANNPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.33%

-55.61%

+16.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.27%

-9.06%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.32%

-13.67%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.73%

-26.85%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.19%

-27.36%

+3.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.61%

-6.70%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.89%

-17.38%

+10.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

2.37%

+0.59%

Volatility

CNSDX vs. ANNPX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Convertible Securities Fund (CNSDX) has a higher volatility of 5.91% compared to Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX) at 5.32%. This indicates that CNSDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANNPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNSDXANNPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.91%

5.32%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.49%

12.96%

+1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.78%

15.75%

+2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.76%

13.19%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.07%

13.73%

-0.66%

CNSDX vs. ANNPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNSDX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than ANNPX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNSDX vs. ANNPX - Dividend Comparison

CNSDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.25%, more than ANNPX's 9.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANNPX
Virtus Convertible Fund
9.68%11.32%2.31%2.56%1.55%20.74%6.94%5.12%18.79%23.47%2.88%10.63%
CNSDX
Invesco Convertible Securities Fund
10.25%11.77%3.46%1.46%3.97%28.36%10.96%5.21%12.65%4.57%3.74%2.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, CNSDX and ANNPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CNSDX has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to ANNPX (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNSDX dropped -39.33% vs ANNPX's -55.61%.

ANNPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNSDX and ANNPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer