PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNRG vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNRG vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNRG achieves a 36.68% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 10.91% return.


CNRG

1D
-2.81%
1M
18.72%
YTD
36.68%
6M
32.67%
1Y
117.30%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
5.21%
10Y*

SPY

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.05%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.91%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNRG vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CNRG
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
36.68%50.23%-14.48%-11.55%-7.98%-15.68%138.35%63.26%-2.87%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-8.12%

Correlation

The correlation between CNRG and SPY is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018

0.62

The correlation between CNRG and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

CNRG vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CNRG
SPY

Industrials

41.2%
7.8%

Technology

29.1%
35.9%

Utilities

25.2%
2.4%

Energy

3.0%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

1.6%
10.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.8%

Financial Services

-

11.8%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Industrials

CNRG
41.2%
SPY
7.8%

Technology

CNRG
29.1%
SPY
35.9%

Utilities

CNRG
25.2%
SPY
2.4%

Energy

CNRG
3.0%
SPY
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

CNRG
1.6%
SPY
10.3%

Basic Materials

CNRG

-

SPY
1.8%

Communication Services

CNRG

-

SPY
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

CNRG

-

SPY
4.8%

Financial Services

CNRG

-

SPY
11.8%

Healthcare

CNRG

-

SPY
8.4%

Real Estate

CNRG

-

SPY
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNRG vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNRG
CNRG Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
CNRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNRG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CNRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNRG Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNRG vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNRGSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.43

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.65

3.16

+3.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.06

14.72

+2.34

CNRG vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNRG Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is higher than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNRG and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNRGSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.25

2.38

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.82

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.59

+0.03

Drawdowns

CNRG vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNRG drawdown since its inception was -68.49%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNRG and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNRGSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.49%

-55.19%

-13.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.73%

-8.88%

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.77%

-18.76%

-30.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.17%

-24.50%

-34.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.12%

-0.70%

-10.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.82%

-9.05%

-22.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.90%

1.91%

+4.99%

Volatility

CNRG vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) has a higher volatility of 12.13% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.84%. This indicates that CNRG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNRGSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.13%

2.84%

+9.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.44%

8.90%

+16.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.49%

11.83%

+24.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.99%

17.05%

+16.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.78%

17.94%

+17.84%

CNRG vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNRG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNRG vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

CNRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNRG
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
1.01%1.46%1.34%1.17%1.23%1.34%0.69%1.16%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


CNRG and SPY have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNRG has higher volatility (12.13%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNRG dropped -68.49% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 13.83% vs 5.21% for CNRG. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 13.83% return vs 5.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CNRG.

CNRG has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.98% for SPY.

CNRG is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. CNRG tracks S&P Kensho Clean Power Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CNRG and 0.09% for SPY.

CNRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNRG and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer