CNRG vs. SPY
CNRG (SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CNRG is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Clean Power Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CNRG returned 5.21%/yr vs 13.83%/yr for SPY. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CNRG charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
CNRG vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNRG achieves a 36.68% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 10.91% return.
CNRG
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 18.72%
- YTD
- 36.68%
- 6M
- 32.67%
- 1Y
- 117.30%
- 3Y*
- 15.27%
- 5Y*
- 5.21%
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
CNRG vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNRG SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF | 36.68% | 50.23% | -14.48% | -11.55% | -7.98% | -15.68% | 138.35% | 63.26% | -2.87% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -8.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNRG and SPY is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018 | 0.62 |
The correlation between CNRG and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
CNRG vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CNRG
SPY
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
CNRG
SPY
Technology
CNRG
SPY
Utilities
CNRG
SPY
Energy
CNRG
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
CNRG
SPY
Basic Materials
CNRG
-
SPY
Communication Services
CNRG
-
SPY
Consumer Defensive
CNRG
-
SPY
Financial Services
CNRG
-
SPY
Healthcare
CNRG
-
SPY
Real Estate
CNRG
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNRG vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
CNRG
SPY
CNRG vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNRG | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.43 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.65 | 3.16 | +3.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.06 | 14.72 | +2.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNRG | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.25 | 2.38 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.82 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.59 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
CNRG vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNRG drawdown since its inception was -68.49%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNRG and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNRG | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.49% | -55.19% | -13.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.73% | -8.88% | -8.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.77% | -18.76% | -30.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.17% | -24.50% | -34.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.12% | -0.70% | -10.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.82% | -9.05% | -22.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.90% | 1.91% | +4.99% |
Volatility
CNRG vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) has a higher volatility of 12.13% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.84%. This indicates that CNRG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNRG | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.13% | 2.84% | +9.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.44% | 8.90% | +16.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.49% | 11.83% | +24.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.99% | 17.05% | +16.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.78% | 17.94% | +17.84% |
CNRG vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNRG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNRG vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
CNRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNRG SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF | 1.01% | 1.46% | 1.34% | 1.17% | 1.23% | 1.34% | 0.69% | 1.16% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CNRG and SPY have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNRG has higher volatility (12.13%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNRG dropped -68.49% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 13.83% vs 5.21% for CNRG. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 13.83% return vs 5.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CNRG.
CNRG has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.98% for SPY.
CNRG is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. CNRG tracks S&P Kensho Clean Power Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CNRG and 0.09% for SPY.
CNRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNRG and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer