PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNRG vs. INR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNRG vs. INR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) and Infinity Natural Resources, Inc (INR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNRG achieves a 8.35% return, which is significantly higher than INR's -11.20% return.


CNRG

1D
0.39%
1M
-11.01%
6M
-1.69%
YTD
8.35%
1Y
51.30%
3Y*
4.82%
5Y*
1.35%
10Y*

INR

1D
1.71%
1M
1.87%
6M
-5.35%
YTD
-11.20%
1Y
-12.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNRG vs. INR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CNRG
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
8.35%47.39%
INR
Infinity Natural Resources, Inc
-11.20%-33.53%

Correlation

The correlation between CNRG and INR is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025

0.03

The correlation between CNRG and INR shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNRG vs. INR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNRG
CNRG Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CNRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNRG Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CNRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNRG Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

INR
INR Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
INR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
INR Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
INR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
INR Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNRG vs. INR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) and Infinity Natural Resources, Inc (INR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CNRGINRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.99

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

-0.34

+2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.92

-0.72

+6.64

CNRG vs. INR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNRG Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the INR Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNRG and INR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNRG vs. INR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNRG drawdown since its inception was -68.49%, which is greater than INR's maximum drawdown of -49.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNRG and INR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNRGINRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.49%

-49.46%

-19.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.26%

-36.35%

+13.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.54%

-40.97%

+11.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.66%

-30.29%

-1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.68%

17.26%

-8.58%

Volatility

CNRG vs. INR - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) has a higher volatility of 12.66% compared to Infinity Natural Resources, Inc (INR) at 10.78%. This indicates that CNRG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNRGINRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.66%

10.78%

+1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.36%

33.96%

-5.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.00%

46.97%

-7.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.66%

49.23%

-14.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.04%

49.23%

-13.19%

Dividends

CNRG vs. INR - Dividend Comparison

CNRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, while INR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CNRG
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
1.26%1.46%1.34%1.17%1.23%1.34%0.69%1.16%0.35%
INR
Infinity Natural Resources, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CNRG and INR have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNRG has higher volatility (12.66%) compared to INR (10.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNRG dropped -68.49% vs INR's -49.46%.

CNRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNRG and INR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer