PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNRG vs. INR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNRG vs. INR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) and Infinity Natural Resources, Inc (INR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNRG achieves a 36.68% return, which is significantly higher than INR's -10.45% return.


CNRG

1D
-2.81%
1M
18.72%
YTD
36.68%
6M
32.67%
1Y
117.30%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
5.21%
10Y*

INR

1D
-0.08%
1M
-23.98%
YTD
-10.45%
6M
-7.96%
1Y
-23.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNRG vs. INR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CNRG
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
36.68%49.16%
INR
Infinity Natural Resources, Inc
-10.45%-30.09%

Correlation

The correlation between CNRG and INR is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2025

0.08

The correlation between CNRG and INR shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNRG vs. INR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNRG
CNRG Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
CNRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNRG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CNRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNRG Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

INR
INR Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
INR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
INR Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
INR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
INR Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNRG vs. INR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) and Infinity Natural Resources, Inc (INR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNRGINRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

0.95

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.65

-0.55

+7.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.06

-0.93

+17.98

CNRG vs. INR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNRG Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is higher than the INR Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNRG and INR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNRGINRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.25

-0.49

+3.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

-0.60

+1.22

Drawdowns

CNRG vs. INR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNRG drawdown since its inception was -68.49%, which is greater than INR's maximum drawdown of -48.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNRG and INR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNRGINRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.49%

-48.84%

-19.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.73%

-42.74%

+25.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.12%

-39.74%

+28.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.82%

-28.50%

-3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.90%

25.09%

-18.19%

Volatility

CNRG vs. INR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) is 12.13%, while Infinity Natural Resources, Inc (INR) has a volatility of 14.58%. This indicates that CNRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNRGINRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.13%

14.58%

-2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.44%

32.68%

-7.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.49%

47.16%

-10.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.99%

49.22%

-15.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.78%

49.22%

-13.44%

Dividends

CNRG vs. INR - Dividend Comparison

CNRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, while INR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CNRG
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
1.01%1.46%1.34%1.17%1.23%1.34%0.69%1.16%0.35%
INR
Infinity Natural Resources, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CNRG and INR have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INR has higher volatility (14.58%) compared to CNRG (12.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNRG dropped -68.49% vs INR's -48.84%.

CNRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNRG and INR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer