CNQQ vs. CN

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

CNQQ (Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF) and CN (Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF) are both China Equities funds - CNQQ tracks the Solactive ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech while CN tracks the MSCI China All Shares. Both are passively managed. CNQQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CN.

Performance

CNQQ vs. CN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CNQQ

• 1D: -4.49%
• 1M: -0.53%
• YTD: 7.00%
• 6M: 6.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNQQ vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CNQQ Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF	7.00%	-5.96%
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Return for Risk

CNQQ vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CNQQ	CN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CNQQ	CN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.54%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.17%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CNQQ	CN	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.91%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.91%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.91%	—	—

CNQQ vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNQQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNQQ vs. CN - Dividend Comparison

CNQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, while CN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	1.80%	2.00%	0.78%	4.18%	2.09%	0.81%	11.41%	14.00%
CNQQ Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF	0.24%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, CNQQ or CN?

On fees, CN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNQQ or CN?

CN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CNQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CNQQ or CN?

CNQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.00% for CN.

What is the main difference between CNQQ and CN?

CNQQ tracks Solactive ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech, while CN tracks MSCI China All Shares. They also come from different issuers: Rayliant and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CNQQ and 0.50% for CN.