PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNM vs. LII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CNM vs. LII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Core & Main, Inc. (CNM) and Lennox International Inc. (LII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNM achieves a -7.00% return, which is significantly lower than LII's 5.78% return.


CNM

1D
-3.46%
1M
2.01%
YTD
-7.00%
6M
-13.83%
1Y
-14.79%
3Y*
18.71%
5Y*
10Y*

LII

1D
-0.94%
1M
0.92%
YTD
5.78%
6M
1.83%
1Y
-5.95%
3Y*
19.41%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
15.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNM vs. LII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CNM
Core & Main, Inc.
-7.00%2.08%25.98%109.27%-36.35%51.70%
LII
Lennox International Inc.
5.78%-19.54%37.27%89.55%-24.94%1.74%

Correlation

The correlation between CNM and LII is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2021

0.54

The correlation between CNM and LII has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

CNM:

$3.02

LII:

$22.20

PE Ratio

CNM:

15.99

LII:

23.07

PEG Ratio

CNM:

0.26

LII:

1.40

PS Ratio

CNM:

0.94

LII:

3.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

CNM:

$7.65B

LII:

$5.26B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CNM:

$2.07B

LII:

$1.74B

EBITDA (TTM)

CNM:

$909.00M

LII:

$1.10B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNM vs. LII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNM
CNM Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
CNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNM Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
CNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNM Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

LII
LII Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
LII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LII Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
LII Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
LII Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
LII Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNM vs. LII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core & Main, Inc. (CNM) and Lennox International Inc. (LII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CNMLIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.00

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.44

-0.18

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.72

-0.29

-0.44

CNM vs. LII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNM Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the LII Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNM and LII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNM vs. LII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNM drawdown since its inception was -40.00%, smaller than the maximum LII drawdown of -62.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNM and LII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNMLIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.00%

-62.76%

+22.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.88%

-33.77%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.74%

-34.71%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.84%

-23.42%

-4.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.17%

-14.51%

-2.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.45%

20.90%

-0.45%

Volatility

CNM vs. LII - Volatility Comparison

Core & Main, Inc. (CNM) has a higher volatility of 11.38% compared to Lennox International Inc. (LII) at 10.80%. This indicates that CNM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNMLIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.38%

10.80%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.48%

26.49%

-3.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.77%

35.30%

+4.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.72%

32.15%

+8.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.72%

29.31%

+11.41%

Dividends

CNM vs. LII - Dividend Comparison

CNM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNM
Core & Main, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LII
Lennox International Inc.
1.02%1.04%0.75%0.97%1.71%1.09%1.12%1.21%1.11%0.94%1.08%1.10%

Financials

CNM vs. LII - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Core & Main, Inc. and Lennox International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B1.80B2.00B20222023202420252026
1.91B
1.14B
(CNM) Total Revenue
(LII) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CNM vs. LII - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Core & Main, Inc. and Lennox International Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

24.0%26.0%28.0%30.0%32.0%34.0%20222023202420252026
27.2%
31.0%
Portfolio components
CNM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Core & Main, Inc. reported a gross profit of 520.00M and revenue of 1.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.

LII - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported a gross profit of 351.30M and revenue of 1.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.

CNM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Core & Main, Inc. reported an operating income of 177.00M and revenue of 1.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.3%.

LII - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported an operating income of 163.50M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

CNM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Core & Main, Inc. reported a net income of 108.00M and revenue of 1.91B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.

LII - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported a net income of 117.20M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CNM and LII have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNM has higher volatility (11.38%) compared to LII (10.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNM dropped -40.00% vs LII's -62.76%.

LII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNM and LII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer