CNM vs. GFF
CNM (Core & Main, Inc.) and GFF (Griffon Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — CNM in Industrial Distribution, GFF in Tools & Accessories. Over the past 3 years, CNM returned 23.07%/yr vs 34.72%/yr for GFF. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CNM vs. GFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNM achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than GFF's 18.36% return.
CNM
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 6.29%
- YTD
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 3.29%
- 1Y
- -12.57%
- 3Y*
- 23.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GFF
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- YTD
- 18.36%
- 6M
- 19.35%
- 1Y
- 24.46%
- 3Y*
- 34.72%
- 5Y*
- 32.40%
- 10Y*
- 21.64%
CNM vs. GFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNM Core & Main, Inc. | 0.40% | 2.08% | 25.98% | 109.27% | -36.35% | 51.70% |
GFF Griffon Corporation | 18.36% | 4.42% | 17.97% | 83.96% | 36.91% | 19.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNM and GFF is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2021 | 0.52 |
The correlation between CNM and GFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
CNM:
$3.34
GFF:
$0.76
CNM:
15.63
GFF:
114.80
CNM:
0.26
GFF:
1.49
CNM:
0.90
GFF:
1.70
CNM:
$7.65B
GFF:
$2.35B
CNM:
$2.06B
GFF:
$1.00B
CNM:
$856.00M
GFF:
$245.38M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNM vs. GFF — Risk / Return Rank
CNM
GFF
CNM vs. GFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core & Main, Inc. (CNM) and Griffon Corporation (GFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNM | GFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.15 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 0.88 | -1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | 2.31 | -2.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNM | GFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 | 0.69 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.04 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
CNM vs. GFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNM drawdown since its inception was -40.00%, smaller than the maximum GFF drawdown of -96.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNM and GFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNM | GFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.00% | -96.84% | +56.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.88% | -27.85% | -6.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.74% | -27.85% | -10.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.10% | -8.09% | -14.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.16% | -55.49% | +38.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.22% | 10.63% | +9.59% |
Volatility
CNM vs. GFF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Core & Main, Inc. (CNM) is 9.05%, while Griffon Corporation (GFF) has a volatility of 11.15%. This indicates that CNM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNM | GFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.05% | 11.15% | -2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.45% | 24.79% | -1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.27% | 35.45% | +3.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.67% | 41.11% | -0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.67% | 45.32% | -4.65% |
Dividends
CNM vs. GFF - Dividend Comparison
CNM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNM Core & Main, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GFF Griffon Corporation | 0.97% | 1.03% | 0.88% | 4.10% | 6.62% | 1.16% | 1.50% | 1.44% | 12.27% | 1.23% | 0.80% | 0.96% |
Financials
CNM vs. GFF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Core & Main, Inc. and Griffon Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CNM vs. GFF - Profitability Comparison
CNM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Core & Main, Inc. reported a gross profit of 428.00M and revenue of 1.58B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.1%.
GFF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a gross profit of 191.99M and revenue of 421.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.5%.
CNM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Core & Main, Inc. reported an operating income of 118.00M and revenue of 1.58B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.5%.
GFF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Griffon Corporation reported an operating income of 87.35M and revenue of 421.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
CNM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Core & Main, Inc. reported a net income of 70.00M and revenue of 1.58B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
GFF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a net income of 46.94M and revenue of 421.86M, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNM and GFF have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFF has higher volatility (11.15%) compared to CNM (9.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNM dropped -40.00% vs GFF's -96.84%.
GFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNM and GFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer