CNDX.AS vs. LYPG.DE
CNDX.AS (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) and LYPG.DE (Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - CNDX.AS is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while LYPG.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Information Technology. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CNDX.AS returned 21.25%/yr vs 23.74%/yr for LYPG.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CNDX.AS charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LYPG.DE.
Performance
CNDX.AS vs. LYPG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNDX.AS achieves a 20.95% return, which is significantly lower than LYPG.DE's 25.00% return. Over the past 10 years, CNDX.AS has underperformed LYPG.DE with an annualized return of 21.25%, while LYPG.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 23.74% annualized return.
CNDX.AS
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 9.31%
- YTD
- 20.95%
- 6M
- 19.45%
- 1Y
- 37.78%
- 3Y*
- 24.53%
- 5Y*
- 18.67%
- 10Y*
- 21.25%
LYPG.DE
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 14.59%
- YTD
- 25.00%
- 6M
- 23.68%
- 1Y
- 48.45%
- 3Y*
- 28.91%
- 5Y*
- 22.18%
- 10Y*
- 23.74%
CNDX.AS vs. LYPG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNDX.AS iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 20.95% | 6.16% | 35.29% | 50.41% | -29.90% | 38.80% | 35.83% | 40.51% | 4.53% | 16.12% |
LYPG.DE Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 25.00% | 9.20% | 41.03% | 49.19% | -28.32% | 41.72% | 30.66% | 51.20% | 0.61% | 20.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNDX.AS and LYPG.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2011 | 0.93 |
The correlation between CNDX.AS and LYPG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNDX.AS vs. LYPG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CNDX.AS
LYPG.DE
CNDX.AS vs. LYPG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) and Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNDX.AS | LYPG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.38 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 3.09 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.01 | 8.18 | +2.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNDX.AS | LYPG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 2.35 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.97 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.07 | 1.10 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 1.02 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
CNDX.AS vs. LYPG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNDX.AS drawdown since its inception was -31.21%, roughly equal to the maximum LYPG.DE drawdown of -31.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDX.AS and LYPG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNDX.AS | LYPG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.21% | -31.83% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.06% | -15.58% | +5.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.57% | -29.64% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.21% | -29.64% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.21% | -31.83% | +0.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -2.70% | +1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.45% | -5.69% | +0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 5.91% | -2.50% |
Volatility
CNDX.AS vs. LYPG.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) is 4.35%, while Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) has a volatility of 7.17%. This indicates that CNDX.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYPG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNDX.AS | LYPG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.35% | 7.17% | -2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.74% | 15.06% | -4.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.45% | 20.52% | -5.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.72% | 22.56% | -2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.61% | 21.45% | -1.84% |
CNDX.AS vs. LYPG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNDX.AS has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than LYPG.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNDX.AS vs. LYPG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CNDX.AS nor LYPG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, CNDX.AS and LYPG.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LYPG.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYPG.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for CNDX.AS.
CNDX.AS is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while LYPG.DE is Technology Equities. CNDX.AS tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while LYPG.DE tracks MSCI World Information Technology. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for CNDX.AS and 0.30% for LYPG.DE.
Find the right allocation for CNDX.AS and LYPG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer