Correlation
The correlation between CNDX.AS and ANXU.L is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
CNDX.AS vs. ANXU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L).
CNDX.AS and ANXU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNDX.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. ANXU.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018. Both CNDX.AS and ANXU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CNDX.AS or ANXU.L.
Performance
CNDX.AS vs. ANXU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
CNDX.AS:
0.27
ANXU.L:
0.52
CNDX.AS:
0.55
ANXU.L:
0.85
CNDX.AS:
1.07
ANXU.L:
1.11
CNDX.AS:
0.25
ANXU.L:
0.52
CNDX.AS:
0.73
ANXU.L:
1.72
CNDX.AS:
9.14%
ANXU.L:
6.77%
CNDX.AS:
22.94%
ANXU.L:
22.18%
CNDX.AS:
-31.21%
ANXU.L:
-35.13%
CNDX.AS:
-13.26%
ANXU.L:
-5.44%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNDX.AS achieves a -9.70% return, which is significantly lower than ANXU.L's -1.63% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CNDX.AS having a 16.77% annualized return and ANXU.L not far ahead at 17.41%.
CNDX.AS
-9.70%
10.03%
-7.24%
6.62%
19.79%
16.90%
16.77%
ANXU.L
-1.63%
9.84%
1.34%
11.65%
22.21%
18.11%
17.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNDX.AS vs. ANXU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNDX.AS has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than ANXU.L's 0.13% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CNDX.AS vs. ANXU.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CNDX.AS
ANXU.L
CNDX.AS vs. ANXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
CNDX.AS vs. ANXU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CNDX.AS nor ANXU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CNDX.AS vs. ANXU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNDX.AS drawdown since its inception was -31.21%, smaller than the maximum ANXU.L drawdown of -35.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDX.AS and ANXU.L.
Loading data...
Volatility
CNDX.AS vs. ANXU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) at 5.85%. This indicates that CNDX.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANXU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...